Es que nada se da cuenta que esta es una de las pocas pistas internacionales dentro de la capital de un pais, muchas de las mejores y mas famosas estan fuera de la capital y a unos kilometros de ella para evitar riesgos como este.
Bueno como ya sabesmos que la pista esta bien hablemos de porque los pilotos de TACA se niegan a hacer seguir las minimas regulaciones de seguridad? sera que TACA los obliga? les impone multas por no aterrizar aunque implique violar la seguridad de los pasajeros? Si AA y COntinental no hubiensen aterrizado en la pista 02 con 10 nudos de viento en cola, Porque TACA lo hace con 10 Kt y humedad en pista? que hace a los pilotos de TACA infalibles? porque tomar riesgos innecesarios'
Te das cuenta esclavo de TACA vos mismo decis que "lo peor fue autorizar el vuelo" para tu informacion quien autoriza es TACA, la torre solo indica, TACA autorizo este vuelo en franca violacion a todas las regulaciones y el piloto aterrizo sin hacer los calculos necesarios, aun aterrizando en el lugar correcto no habia forma que el avion se detuviera dentro de la pista
If we assume, that the airplane comes into the picture about 650 meters past the displaced threshold and has 1000 meters to go until the runway end, we would compute following scenarios (starting point 650 meters down the runway at a speed of 155.0 knots):
1) at a constant deceleration rate of 1.5 meters/second/second (2.9 knots/s = target of minimum autobrake) the airplane would need 2119 meters to stop and pass the runway end at a speed of 112 knots.
2) at a constant deceleration rate of 3.0 meters/second/second (5.8 knots/s = target maximum autobrake) the airplane would need 1059 meters to stop and overrun the runway end at a speed of 36 knots.
3) the airplane would need to exercise a constant deceleration rate of 3.18 meters/second/second (6.18 knots/s) to stop at the runway end. This deceleration rate is possible with manual braking.
2) at a constant deceleration rate of 3.0 meters/second/second (5.8 knots/s = target maximum autobrake) the airplane would need 1059 meters to stop and overrun the runway end at a speed of 36 knots.
3) the airplane would need to exercise a constant deceleration rate of 3.18 meters/second/second (6.18 knots/s) to stop at the runway end. This deceleration rate is possible with manual braking.
2) at a constant deceleration rate of 3.0 meters/second/second (5.8 knots/s = target maximum autobrake) the airplane would need 1059 meters to stop and overrun the runway end at a speed of 36 knots.
3) the airplane would need to exercise a constant deceleration rate of 3.18 meters/second/second (6.18 knots/s) to stop at the runway end. This deceleration rate is possible with manual braking.
For your Info Moron! American airline and Continental according to their SOP prohibit to land in Toncontin runway 02 with more than 5 kt of tail wind, TACA 390 did it with 10 kt in addition to wet or damp runway witch add more difficulties to the landing, more than 1430 meters of runway are need it in order to perform such a landing.
The Big question: the pilot violated the SOP? or the airline operator push the pilots to land no matter what to comply with the schedules?
alguien tiene o sabe si existe un video de alguien q lo haya grabado en vivo..??
danielesquivel07 2 years ago
Es que nada se da cuenta que esta es una de las pocas pistas internacionales dentro de la capital de un pais, muchas de las mejores y mas famosas estan fuera de la capital y a unos kilometros de ella para evitar riesgos como este.
ckto25 3 years ago
Bueno como ya sabesmos que la pista esta bien hablemos de porque los pilotos de TACA se niegan a hacer seguir las minimas regulaciones de seguridad? sera que TACA los obliga? les impone multas por no aterrizar aunque implique violar la seguridad de los pasajeros? Si AA y COntinental no hubiensen aterrizado en la pista 02 con 10 nudos de viento en cola, Porque TACA lo hace con 10 Kt y humedad en pista? que hace a los pilotos de TACA infalibles? porque tomar riesgos innecesarios'
VivaElChorizo 3 years ago
Te das cuenta esclavo de TACA vos mismo decis que "lo peor fue autorizar el vuelo" para tu informacion quien autoriza es TACA, la torre solo indica, TACA autorizo este vuelo en franca violacion a todas las regulaciones y el piloto aterrizo sin hacer los calculos necesarios, aun aterrizando en el lugar correcto no habia forma que el avion se detuviera dentro de la pista
VivaElChorizo 3 years ago
If we assume, that the airplane comes into the picture about 650 meters past the displaced threshold and has 1000 meters to go until the runway end, we would compute following scenarios (starting point 650 meters down the runway at a speed of 155.0 knots):
1) at a constant deceleration rate of 1.5 meters/second/second (2.9 knots/s = target of minimum autobrake) the airplane would need 2119 meters to stop and pass the runway end at a speed of 112 knots.
VivaElChorizo 3 years ago
2) at a constant deceleration rate of 3.0 meters/second/second (5.8 knots/s = target maximum autobrake) the airplane would need 1059 meters to stop and overrun the runway end at a speed of 36 knots.
3) the airplane would need to exercise a constant deceleration rate of 3.18 meters/second/second (6.18 knots/s) to stop at the runway end. This deceleration rate is possible with manual braking.
VivaElChorizo 3 years ago
2) at a constant deceleration rate of 3.0 meters/second/second (5.8 knots/s = target maximum autobrake) the airplane would need 1059 meters to stop and overrun the runway end at a speed of 36 knots.
3) the airplane would need to exercise a constant deceleration rate of 3.18 meters/second/second (6.18 knots/s) to stop at the runway end. This deceleration rate is possible with manual braking.
VivaElChorizo 3 years ago
2) at a constant deceleration rate of 3.0 meters/second/second (5.8 knots/s = target maximum autobrake) the airplane would need 1059 meters to stop and overrun the runway end at a speed of 36 knots.
3) the airplane would need to exercise a constant deceleration rate of 3.18 meters/second/second (6.18 knots/s) to stop at the runway end. This deceleration rate is possible with manual braking.
VivaElChorizo 3 years ago
For your Info Moron! American airline and Continental according to their SOP prohibit to land in Toncontin runway 02 with more than 5 kt of tail wind, TACA 390 did it with 10 kt in addition to wet or damp runway witch add more difficulties to the landing, more than 1430 meters of runway are need it in order to perform such a landing.
The Big question: the pilot violated the SOP? or the airline operator push the pilots to land no matter what to comply with the schedules?
VivaElChorizo 3 years ago
verdad eh
vcsgfxcbfz 3 years ago