B17 Flying Fortress attacked by Japanese Zero
Top Comments
All Comments (38)
-
@BROOKS39 the tail gun on a b17 was on the bottom, so comming high and from the back was a good way not to get shot
-
suck cock motherfucker!
-
@sweetcarmate no havent but how does this look like a game to you? to me it looks real
-
he didint shoot??
-
i dont see how you can mistake this for a game! games are good looking but cme on you morons.
-
I guess the real thing were real young men died in horrible ways ain't good enough for our modern thirst for vicarious thrills. HAPPY MEMORIAL DAY.
-
@killmastermurder Yes, but I liked IL-2 better. The graphic and feel of the game is better. It has a good selection of German,British and Russina planes but it only has 1 US fighter which kind of sucked. i would have liked to see a P-47 or P-38 in the game.If you liked Blazing Angles yoiu will love IL-2
-
If this was fairdinks in WW2 the Zero would have attacked from about 2 oclock high! A rear approach on a gunship like the B-17 would have been totally insane. If the twelve or thirteen 50 calibers on the B-17 didn't hit the engine cowling or take out the prop they certainly would have killed the zero pilot...
Gotta dislike this stupid game footage - particularly when you see it on the "related videos" listing and click, only to find you've been had! Who cares how well you can play a game???
I'm sure someone will take offense but, it's boring and tedious.
sweetcarmate 3 years ago 8
@petervanwinkles I don't understand your comment.
This really is a video-game.
I mean have you seen Final Fantasy XIII graphics?
muffinlove23 1 year ago