A Climate Change Carol - part 1

A Climatechange Carol - stooge was a tight-fisted hand at the grind-stone, a squeezing, clutching, covetous, front man for explotation of the earth and slavery of its people. what did Stooge care! about the planet or the loss of its forests and ocean life, or the plight of its people, the glory of existence replaced with graft ,progress, growth,profit by a few from the many ..

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• cop15
• climate
• change
• gore
• tax
• nwo
• deek
• jackson
• fknnewz
• landocracy
• christmas
• carol
• dickens

[pigsbishop99]

Too longwinded.

[fknnewz]

agreed ill try and pack it in next epsode

[HorseBadorites]

come on dude tidy your bedroom pick they panties up off the floor before Tommy Mars breaks his neck, jeesus

[fknnewz]

good - Ive never been a fan of Tommy Mars style, rather pedestrian, like he was stroking Keith Emerson.

[BankScamTakeover]

Possibly one of your best ever videos Deek. A hilarious parody, elegant in its application, scarily truthful in its content. Nice work.

[kronier]

ha ha ha, excellent work!

[michalchik]

@cytuber I was around at that time also. It was not the scientists saying that. I challenge you to find one scientific source that pushed the idea we we about to go into a new ice age. It was popular press who had finally picked up on the fact that we have periodic ice ages followed by warm periods, We have been a warm period for a pretty long time so they concluded we must be about to go into another ice age. Yes there was hysteria but not from climatologists.

[He101A]

The best video ever!

[Ace1000ks]

Funny, but entirely true!!!

[HostileNegotiator]

Oh goodness. Ice ages and climate changes are caused by things. O.k. Like volcanoes exploding and emitting tons and tons of material into the atmosphere. Do all our factories, oil burning, coal burning and cutting down of the forests impact this? Of course. Should we use cleaner energy? Of course! Should we clean up the output we cause? Of course! Should we continue the current mismanagement of resources both natural and financial? Of course NOT.

[He101A]

Hahahahahahahahaha, lol. This is so damn funny.

[CelticAlphabet]

@MauserBroom There was no ignoring the data. The term "hide the decline" isn't referring to global temperatures, it was a term used to account to tree ring proxy temperatures and yes there is a huge consensus on global warming and it is being caused by man. And faith is not required in science, science dispels faith by design because its an investigation not a predetermined conclusion. We choose to follow the evidence, what ever the evidence is, even if its not what we want it to be.

[MauserBroom]

@CelticAlphabet And the computer modelling program that was coded to ignore data that conflicted with the theory?

Basically, I've heard testimony from scientist on both sides, enough to conclude that there is no concensus. I also see that certain govts are just using it as a way to tax us more. Or try to. I have no faith in climatologists now. Peer review cannot be infallible if conducted by humans especially if working from the same incorrect basis of information. Its over for me i'm afraid.

[CelticAlphabet]

@MauserBroom Nothing was covered up in peer review. He explained that in the last video.

And none of the emails contained any evidence of covering up info. If you don't believe me at least 5 peer review journals including Nature have all done throuhough reviews of the emails and all of them have concluded that there is no conspiracy, at best the 4 mis quoted emails were written unprofessionally. You cannot fake results in peer review, its a self correcting process. Evidence>all.

[MauserBroom]

@CelticAlphabet Hmm, but re: peer review there was a lack of independence there - as uncovered in the Climategate scandal. It would be like having the existence of god peer reviewed by the church.

[Kropotkin2000]

That wasn't Revelle's idea at all. His hypothesis was that the oceans were an inadequate carbon sink for the CO2 produced by humans, he's since been proven correct. He also did not change his mind before his death, nor would it have mattered. Science doesn't stand on the whim of an individual.