Pipeline Politics
Loading...
Loading...
16:47
Chris Faulkner: Pipelines 101by AgendaStevePaikin131 views- 16:58
Ezra Levantby AgendaStevePaikin3,781 views
- 3:48
Agenda Insight: Resistance is Not Futileby AgendaStevePaikin223 views
- 13:34
Andrew Revkin: America's Reliance on Oil Sandsby AgendaStevePaikin680 views
- 5:28
Northern Gateway Pipeline hearingsby TomHarrisICSC513 views
- 23:26
Protest Against Keystone XL Pipelineby EricSheptock124 views
- 2:07
Common Sense - Keystone pipelineby CBS21News27 views
- 27:47
Keystone Pipelineby TheLibertariat8 views
- 2:33
Canada's controversial 'oil sands' pipeline projectby AFP1,319 views
- 16:46
Oil in Eden: The Battle to Protect Canada's Pacific Coastby PacificWildLive41,734 views
- 3:57
Joint Review Panel Enbridge Protest Rally Native Group Drums in Beginningby TerraceDailyOnline68 views
- 4:05
Agenda Insight: Say Yes to Keystoneby AgendaStevePaikin111 views
- 36:55
Alberta's Political Landscapeby AgendaStevePaikin276 views
- 3:41
Your Agenda Insight: Liberalism of Conviction and of Convenienceby AgendaStevePaikin440 views
- 39:32
The Future of Oilby AgendaStevePaikin331 views
- 6:39
10-year old Ta'Kaiya says 'Protect our coast from oil spills'by GreenpeaceCanada18,792 views
- 42:53
Quebec's Political Pulseby AgendaStevePaikin170 views
- 6:39
10-year old Ta'Kaiya says 'Protect our coast from oil spills'by matedemn19 views
- 15:28
Diane Pacom: Canada, Modest No More?by AgendaStevePaikin159 views
- 10:52
CBC Showdown: Sierra Club vs "Ethical Oil" - One of them is a Ridiculous Radicalby TheSecretStore59,555 views
It is less expensive to save jobs than to create new business. Obama saved the American Automotive and Financial industries with TARP (not to mention over 8-millions jobs). Furthermore, the U.S. will likely see profitable returns from the project, and theTeaParty slammed him for it.
The TeaParty then procedes to push their pet project for costly and out-dated energy to create a mere 10,000 jobs (for which many american workers have been deemed "unqualified").
TeaParty = corporateCommies
NanoEmpyrean 1 month ago
We can not continue to use coal/oil for decades to come. It's cheaper to invest in nega-watts and renewables right now. Turbines and PV arrays can be deployed right now. We should not consider destroying our planet by "exploiting" the oilsands. The EROEI of the oil sands is very low and highly polluting. To quote an industry exec. it's a hell of a way to convert gold to lead (natural gas into oil - our cleanest carbon fuel to one of our dirtiest).
eTwisted 1 month ago
Is environmentalism a luxury consumption good? If it is, does it not then need excess capital in order to sustain it?
AkivaII 1 month ago
"Oil sands or tar sands? The oil sands contain a type of heavy oil called bitumen – oil similar in consistency to tar but chemically very different. Tar is a man-made substance produced from organic material, usually coal."
.....source....Wikipedia. They are called Oil Sands not Tar Sands.
408Magenta 1 month ago
Keystone will be approved. We all know this and once the politicians stop playing towards the end of the year, it will be made known to all.
408Magenta 1 month ago