PRESUMPTIONS

Evolution is theory presented as fact. It is in reality, a presumption based on a bias. Ads4Christ admittedly believes the Bible's account of a 6-day creation. That is our presumption. We however commend those evolutionists who, unlike the majority, believe in intelligent design.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Science
• Evolution
• Creation
• Genesis
• Origins

[sunlitekid01]

sorry to burst ur bubble.......

EVOLUTION HAS BEEN PROVEN....

SCIENTIFICALLY

 u can deny it all u want

[Ads4Christ]

Evolution? Proven? How did single cell replicating life begin? If you have proven that, you're smarter than Dawkins! And with all due respect, I doubt that my friend! Even he admitted that he didn't know how it started. He even left the door open for intelligent design. He just refused to believe that a higher power did it, preferring to believe that possibly some higher evolved alien seeded life. Proven? You'll have to do better than that. Not only is it not proven, it is not provable.

[NonPointRulz101]

@Ads4Christ umm, you have that confused with abiogenesis, my friend. and dawkins never even said that; he was speaking hypothetically, so don't try to twist his words around

[Savior20061]

Evolution is the study of how lifeforms change over time to better suit their environment=proven. Whether there is a God or isn't, is not the point

The study of how life began, (without Christian magic is)=abiogenesis.

World creating itself is just another way of saying us atheists believe that something can come from nothing which we don't.

[thisis3d]

djarm57 has an excellent series about abiogenesis uploaded on his channel, go watch it

[lukaskoube]

this video is factually incorrect, try a google search to find out how the world came about!!!!!

there is lots of evidence too, all you need is google ;)

[lowcomedy]

So, supernatural creation, of which you have no evidence of, is not a presumption and millions of observations and demonstrable experiments are?

Because we have seen stars form, planets made in the accretion discs of protostars and speciation (macroevolution in both real time and through out the fossil record)

You're trying to drag science down to your own ignorant level.

[cliffw77]

feel free to watch the Video I did on the subject then you can comment there

[sunlitekid01]

U can disprove the bible. its in the very 1st chapter. when "GOD" says he created man from dirt and women from mans ribs. And that light was created 1st before the "sun and the stars" which is IMPOSSIBLE as the sun is the only light providing STAR for our solar system. so if u wanna LITERALLY use the bible then its WRONG but if u wanna use it as a metaphor then no ATHEIST has a problem with that. Just dont say its the "literal / absolute" word of god cuz ders a 100 books like that. :)

[sunlitekid01]

i dont blame u for ur ignorance.. u were probably brought up in a CHRISTIAN fundamentalist home which never really focused on science. if ur HONEST enough to go take a sceince class at at least a HIGH SCHOOL level and if u really want to understand BIOLOGY for undersatnding it then u wudnt have suck a fundamental problem in understanding sceince. Evolution has nothing to do with ABIOGENESIS. All u christians confuse the two terms. Ur willfully ignorant and thats not our problem. its urs.

[cliffw77]

Even if you can prove that Macroevolution occured, you can not disprove the Bible I did a couple of videos on this feel free to watch and comment. As for the Origin of Life there is no other interpretation of the evidence that God did it and Specfically that the God of the Bible did it.

[cliffw77]

Even if you can prove that Macroevolution occured, you can not disprove the Bible I did a couple of videos on this feel free to watch and comment.