Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Nikon D3 digital SLR review by What Digital camera: Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
39,466
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 13, 2008

Nikon D3 digital SLR camera review by What Digital Camera magazine: Part 2. Part one: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=slcPbmM9wKc

More camera reviews: http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equipment/

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (WhatDigitalCamera)

  • It would be great. The picture quality from those big pixels will reveal a real depth and subtlety of tone, and excellent shadow detail.

    On the other hand the D3 is a heavy beast. Why not get much the same image quality in a smaller camera by getting the new D700? (And for about 1/3rd less money too). Its a beauty -- our video review of it will be up here any day now.

  • hi D3 or D2xs whats different about picture quality ??? thanks

  • The D3 is a quantum leap in picture quality over the D2X. Completely different sensor, and full frame.

  • I'd guess the 5D MkII (or 6D?) would be about the same price, but I'll be staggered if they don't announce it at Photokina in mid-september, so we don't have long to wait.

Top Comments

  • wow it puts my cannon 400d to shame.

  • Rusty, I only said " you did not know what you are talking about" because you said "in film days no one shoots more than 800 ISO." and that is not true. And trust me, after shooting for newspapers for 12 years, I have just about shot in any situation you can think of.

see all

All Comments (31)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @WhatDigitalCamera Very homosexualish video!

  • Cool! This camera is great for Time Lapse Photography too! you just need this device: (copy address do browser): tempusALL.bymac.org

    I got very professional time-lapse videos with thiscamera! cool sunset videos!

  • you can tell is the 14-24mm because of the hood and the front element

  • "use a film higher than 800 iso will give you a super grainy shots thats not acceptable for most newspapers"

    I lol'd. ISO 100 and 800 practically look the same on newspaper printed smaller than 8x10. (it's kinda impossible to get a non-grainy image in a newspaper)

  • it is maybe 14-24mm f/2.8:)

  • what is that lens attached to the camera?

  • rene as i said every shooting situation is different so what i have experience is very different on what you have experience coz sun don't shine brightly the same all over the world, *Shrug*.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more