Jeff King MIT on 911 Part 1

WOW all these comments are about wether or not this guy is a "MIT engineer" or an "engineer from MIT"? This is what they want you to argue about

Yeah, it's kinda like Clinton saying "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"
It's a question of the "implied" credentials.

I think the origonal 911 commission budget was only 4 million. Thats half of what was spent to investigate Clintons BJ scandal.

The inital budget for NIST WAS $16 M that's a matter of public record. Check for yourself( even check the "truther" sites )

Think on this, IT was CLINTON who cost the taxpayers all that money. If he'd admitted what he did up front then Ken Star wouldn't had to spend that money to eventually get to the truth!

"MIT Engineer." lmao! Yeah right.

I really wonder what's going to happen when the truth finally comes out and people who have been blindly following the government about 9/11 understand what all that actually means?

When you factor in all the devious fake things the US has done for a century this is not too far fetched to believe.

Look and listen closely, he said he STUDIED at MIT not an MIT engineer. Also you cant dispute the physical evidence he points out. Wake up and stop being a slave.

Wow. Good video

"The title "MIT Engineer" was not of my choosing, and I consider it somewhat misleading, though I did study Electrical Engineering at MIT" - Jeff King

Straight from the horse's ugh whatever