Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Jeff King MIT on 911 Part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
22,017
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 17, 2006

Jeff King, MIT engineer, explains how the official story about 9-11-01, is bogus. This clip was taken from 911 revisited. It is short and full of vital info that everyone needs to know. This is a must watch. This is part 1 of 2.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 22 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (124)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • To say one's an “MIT engineer” is to imply that one either teaches engineering at MIT or else otherwise worked for MIT as an engineer. Jeff King is not now nor has he ever been an MIT engineer, nor has he ever taught engineering or worked as an engineer for any university ever. He’s been a family doctor for at least 27 years and only received a joint biology/electrical engineering degree from MIT in 1974 to briefly work in medical devices before turning to medicine.

  • @MrJeggus

    August 21, 2002

    "The Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) today announced details of its $16 million, 24-month federal building and fire safety investigation to study the structural failure and subsequent progressive collapse of several World Trade Center (WTC) buildings "

    Now STFU moron I told you it was public record but you're too stupid to do that before making an ass of yourself.

    Care to do it again ?

  • @thedman113 the NIST report actually admitted that their computer models didnt show any collapse of the towers. epic fail for mentioning that in support of the official 9-11 fairytale in which the actual laws of reality need to be suspended in order to be facilitated. next.

  • @zmhockey Yes, I can dispute his 'evidence'. It has been debunked over and over again for years.

  • @lawharrison That's right, it was about half, because the 9/11 commission was just writing a report. They weren't conducting the actual investigation. NIST was. So quit trying to be misleading.

  • are you mentally challenged?

  • Yeah, it's kinda like Clinton saying "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

    It's a question of the "implied" credentials.

  • The inital budget for NIST WAS $16 M that's a matter of public record. Check for yourself( even check the "truther" sites )

    Think on this, IT was CLINTON who cost the taxpayers all that money. If he'd admitted what he did up front then Ken Star wouldn't had to spend that money to eventually get to the truth!

  • WOW all these comments are about wether or not this guy is a "MIT engineer" or an "engineer from MIT"? This is what they want you to argue about

  • I think the origonal 911 commission budget was only 4 million. Thats half of what was spent to investigate Clintons BJ scandal.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more