Democrats Used to Say There Were WMD

Many prominent democrats said Saddam should be removed and that there were WMD's. Now those comments are forgotten and non one seems to hold them to account.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• democrats
• john
• edwards
• hillary
• clinton

[StoogeWatcher]

We all know the truth: It's "Say no to war unless a Democrat is President!"

[loudchristian2112]

Good stuff, man. Keep up the good work.

[falcondriver100]

One Democrat is upset with the truth being told! Imagine that!!!!!!

[publicmario17]

Clinton bombed Iraq in 1993 in retaliation for an attempted assassination by Saddam's agent on former President Bush Sr. while on his visit to Kuwait. In 1996, Clinton bombed Iraq because the Iraqi Army invaded Iraqi Kurdistan which Iraq was not allowed to be near with as he was forbade by UNSCR 688 to oppress his own people. In 1998, Clinton bombed Iraq for four days because Iraq wasn't fully complying with UNSCRs.

Iraq attacked our no-fly-zones patrols, meaning an act of war against the US

[Pierre88720]

OP, if you think this is some kind of proof that Democrats, not Republicans, were responsible for the WMD myth, then you must not understand the malleability of sound clips...NOT REAL EVIDENCE. If you were filmed all day, I'm sure someone could piece together some fabulous statement of you saying something along the lines of "George W. Bush is a moron." Good work, buddy...

[Trekkerjon]

@Fitzcard Add another 90 thousand or so from Wikileaks. Then consider the thousands of indirect deaths resulting from an entire country being shut down for seven years. half a million to a million is realistic.

[Fitzcard]

@Trekkerjon The body count thing is anywhere from 80,000-7,000,000 depending on which "agency" you are refering. Iraq itself is estimating a grand total of 150,000. A british research team, in the millions. France, US, China, all different numbers. Who knows, alot is alot.

[Fitzcard]

@Trekkerjon Im not justifing bush at all. Mearly asking how someone can hate, hate, hate, hate Bush, but love, love, love ,love bush light... err, clinton/obama. Also, its getting close to 100,000, not hundreds of thousands or as some like to use, millions and millions. (again, not justifing or approving of bush in any shape or form)

[Trekkerjon]

@91jbAs They voted "authorization" meaning they assumed Bush would act with good judgment.  Obviously, Bush wanted his war no matter what , no matter the consequences.

[Trekkerjon]

@Fitzcard sounds like you are trying to divert. Bush's invasion and occupation resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.

[Fitzcard]

@Trekkerjon Here's the thing. Clinton bombed Iraq into the stone age twice. Not a problem with most. Bush ordered the water boarding of 3 top Al-qaeda leaders, untold amounts of opposition. Obama has ordered the assassination of 3 dozen american extremist working against the US abroad, no haebus corpus no trial, just kill on site regardless of where found, crickets chirping from the anti-water boarding crowd.

Hypocrits on all sides... but the anti-bush/pro-obama crowd take the cake.

[Trekkerjon]

yeah, they all believed Bush. Who stood up against this? Sen Byrd Rep Kucinich.

After seven years , hundreds of thousands of Iraqi dead. wasnt worth it.