Don't matter - it proves evolution. This is Genesis Week, Season 1, Episode 1
Loading...
7,100
Loading...
There is no Interactive Transcript.
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
@sfgayatheist Irrelevant comment; a virus without a host is dead. Propositions are only pure speculation and pseudoscience ie. worthless opinion. The scientific method requires the direct observation, repeated testing of a testable repeating phenomenon for study, documentation and reproduction.
Chemistry is the interaction of the chemical elements which behave predictably by governed commands/instructions which can only come from a superior mind/being that designed and made them as such.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 day ago
@sfgayatheist You cannot even define what a contradiction is. My faith is based on God's word which Real Science can only confirm when it catches up. Real Science is only possible in a world where a logical being created it with order. Real Science confirms that all that exists is intelligently design and irreducibly complex. It is so complex that Human, Insects, Animals and of course Mindless and Lifeless Chemical Elements that you worship cannot make a flea or a pea. All bio-mimicry flops.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 day ago
@sfgayatheist Trust in the Creator God of the Bible is not superstitious, but believing without evidence and unscientifically that mindless and lifeless chemical elements collaborated to make the alleged first self-replicating cell that then transmuted into all the life forms that ever lived including you is PATENTLY ABSURD! Whereas, the Biblical claims are being confirmed by Archaeologists/Science ex. the first advent of Jesus foretold thousands of years in advance, the language of God in DNA.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 day ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Good question. What will it profit me to believe and promulgate a superstitious belief in a creator?
sfgayatheist 1 day ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN You are contradicting yourself. Is your belief in this intelligence based on evidence or faith? It must be faith because there is simply no evidence of such a ridiculously complex intelligence.
sfgayatheist 1 day ago
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Not all biological life relies on DNA; some simple life forms (viruses) use only RNA for replication of genes. I'm also not proposing that the earliest life was a complex cell, but rather some simple self-replicating protein molecules governed purely by chemistry. I propose that life had very simple beginnings (basic chemistry) whereas you propose that an infinitely complex being popped into existence and then wished life to begin (magic).
sfgayatheist 1 day ago
@sfgayatheist What cell can survive without ATP? YOU ARE GULLIBLE EVIL LYING ATHEIST AND AN ANTI-INTELLECTUAL. HUMANS HAVE NOT MADE A LIVING SELF-REPLICATING CELL USING ONLY THE CHEMICAL ELEMENTS OF THE PERIODIC TABLE, BUT IF THEY DID, IT WOULD PROVE GOD DUN-IT ALL. HOWEVER, EVIL EVOLUTIONISM REQUIRES MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS TO MAGICALLY DUN-IT ALL WITHOUT BEING ALIVE OR POSSESSING A MIND. ALL BIOLOGICAL LIFE IS GOVERNED BY INSTRUCTION IN THE DNA WHICH CANNOT COME FORM MATERIALS.
HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 2 days ago
@QueeqegF when creationists refer to evolution and thermodynamics they are referring to the misconception that life violates the 2nd law.. the problem arises when you don't take into account the fact that the 2nd law of thermodynamics only applies to closed systems. the earth is not a closed system. It is the sun that drives life and fuels the biological processes driving evolution.
robman8855 2 days ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012
@HISTRUTHBEKNOWN Nobody is proposing that the earliest life had anything like the ATP cycle as part of its function. Furthermore, science has established that abiogenisis is possible via several mechanisms. We will likely never know which mechanism took place on Earth, but it nonetheless happened or you would not be here.
sfgayatheist 2 days ago in playlist Golden Crocoduck nominees 2012