Richard Feynman on God

Richard Feynman compares Science to Mystic Answers

• Category

  Education

[bammbamm12]

Yes, good idea. Arguing with a liar like you is fruitless.

[sleepyeyeguy]

I suggest you do your homework again. No eye witnesses, very scant historical evidence (with various forgeries), and evidence of regurgitated elements of the story from older mythical religious tales. Common sense? Uh, common sense tells me that the source of the entire universe is not a humanized, father figure that has a vested interest in a species that has only been around for a mere 100,000 years. I'm done talking to you... this is a waste of time. Peace.

[Ira T]

2 of the few religions that believe ALL life is sacred. From a human to a small beetle.

[bammbamm12]

You don't decide what is and is not evidence. We have eyewitness historical accounts. We have common sense too. You don't do a chemical test in your morning orange juice to evidence that it hasn't been poisoned. You also believe in extra terrestrials and missing links (which, last I checked, is still missing).

[Balladeerish]

Thanks for the upload.



[Kturn2010]

Now that sounds like a real scientific approach on the reality of life.lets just educate ourselves an see what we can find but wheather theres an answer to life ..ummm we just dont know ...how about just live an make the best of such a short time

[Mesdriver]

Fail, done with you.

Out you go.

[SeaTacAtheist]

Christianity is not derivative? I've not seen any convincing and reasoned argument that disproves that.

No one who is a Christian ever even brings up such a possibility.

[UStillCantKill]

Because it's a load of bollocks without a shred of real evidence to even suggest it, and no one who's not an atheist windbag would ever even bring it up?