Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Miskolczi`s New Greenhouse Law

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
8,459
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 27, 2009

Dr Miklos Zagoni explains his colleagues new research on Greenhouse gasses that show CO2 will not increase the earths temperature any further

  • likes, 34 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • RealClimate---you mean the blog the defends the flawed science of the Hockey Stick?

  • @OvoidCranium and Campbell the editor of Nature doesn't?

    Why do you think he was excluded from the investigation into the UEA emails?

    These emails actually give away the fact that a small group of scientists who are not worthy of the name conspired to interfere with the peer review system.

    Now can you stop you irrelevant attacks and refute the paper?

see all

All Comments (431)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What are you talking about? Miskolc's further PROVES that AGW is real and serious and happening now! Miskolc is not a denier. His conclusions SUPPORT the IPCC!

  • @nightvid08 you think it's dependent on composition then give us the correct equations showing it.

  • @OvoidCranium If his theories were able to stand up to scrutiny he'd be published in the major papers already.

  • @OvoidCranium For an example, the editor for Energy and Environment, Boehmer-Christiansen, has confessed that she is allowing her political agenda to affect her editorializing.

  • @joshcryer I recognise the cry of those unable to refute the papers well. Feel free to continue in your pipe dream.

  • @OvoidCranium The "journals" he was printed in are third rate and not recognized by the peer review at large. His papers would not make it in to any credible journal.

  • @joshcryer neither are you so that puts you on equal footing. It's Miskolczi's papers that have passed peer review and have stood for 6 and 3 years without effective refutation.

  • @OvoidCranium Zagoni isn't even worthy of the peer review.

  • @joshcryer the second rate science fiction writer?

    Yeah right no one has yet debunked it in the peer reviewed literature Levenson makes some very basic errors that he would never be able to get through like assuming the atmospheric pressure can do work on the rigid surface.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more