Miskolczi`s New Greenhouse Law
Top Comments
All Comments (431)
-
What are you talking about? Miskolc's further PROVES that AGW is real and serious and happening now! Miskolc is not a denier. His conclusions SUPPORT the IPCC!
-
@nightvid08 you think it's dependent on composition then give us the correct equations showing it.
-
@OvoidCranium If his theories were able to stand up to scrutiny he'd be published in the major papers already.
-
@OvoidCranium For an example, the editor for Energy and Environment, Boehmer-Christiansen, has confessed that she is allowing her political agenda to affect her editorializing.
-
@joshcryer I recognise the cry of those unable to refute the papers well. Feel free to continue in your pipe dream.
-
@OvoidCranium The "journals" he was printed in are third rate and not recognized by the peer review at large. His papers would not make it in to any credible journal.
-
@joshcryer neither are you so that puts you on equal footing. It's Miskolczi's papers that have passed peer review and have stood for 6 and 3 years without effective refutation.
-
@OvoidCranium Zagoni isn't even worthy of the peer review.
-
@joshcryer the second rate science fiction writer?
Yeah right no one has yet debunked it in the peer reviewed literature Levenson makes some very basic errors that he would never be able to get through like assuming the atmospheric pressure can do work on the rigid surface.
RealClimate---you mean the blog the defends the flawed science of the Hockey Stick?
acx1n9s 2 years ago 12
@OvoidCranium and Campbell the editor of Nature doesn't?
Why do you think he was excluded from the investigation into the UEA emails?
These emails actually give away the fact that a small group of scientists who are not worthy of the name conspired to interfere with the peer review system.
Now can you stop you irrelevant attacks and refute the paper?
OvoidCranium 1 year ago 5