Blinder M25 J16 vs LTI Ultralyte 2008 test

http://www.delonixradar.com.au/radar_detectors/tests/2008-laser-jammer-test.php

We tested the Blinder M25 (version J16) dual head laser jammer against a LTI LR100 Ultralyte (100pps) from both front and behind. If you liked this video (not necessarily the performance of the jammer, but the effort we put into testing these products), please rate this video accordingly and add our channel to your favorites, as we still have a stack of videos like this to be edited and then uploaded from our 2008 laser jammer test.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Blinder
• M25
• J16
• laser
• jammer
• LTI
• Ultralyte
• Lidar

[delonixradar]

Inconsistency is not a great attribute for a jammer.

[Jkaymobile]

But dosent the alarm in the car warn you as soon as he hits you with the laser which wouuld have given him time to slow down?

[delonixradar]

Yes, you would have had time to slow down in some encounters....not all encounters.

[blindervideoman]

hmmm...i dont know what whats wrong with your jammer, but i have an M25 on my bmw and it jams to gun. check out some of my videos by searching with my user name, are your heads level? mine works flawless with the pro laser II, pro laser III, laser atlanta, and the lti ultralyte

[rowan4321]

Thats the thing I dont like about the M25 it doesnt work when you only 100m away. Today I was targeted by what I could see was a LTI in a school zone V1 alerted, I knew he was there for like 200m then he shojt me at 100m away, so if I had been speeding and had a dodget jammer he would of got me speeding