@jasaguayo i assume atheists watched the god side and were like'i dont agree with that' and dislike whereas a creationist looked at the big bang side and said 'i dont agree with that' and dislike. that system kinda sucks don't it?
@westauxwaitaks Another case of the bible failing biology: "There are some that only chew the cud or only have a split hoof, but you must not eat them. The camel, though it chews the cud, does not have a split hoof; it is ceremonially unclean for you." (Leviticus 11:4)
A quick glance could verify that camels do in fact have split hooves.
@westauxwaitaks Here's another one: "All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: ... Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket, or grasshopper." (Leviticus 11:20-22)
Pretty sure even ancient people should've known that grasshoppers have six legs...
@westauxwaitaks I can prove plenty of parts of the bible wrong: "And I will provide a place for my people Israel and will plant them so that they can have a home of their own and no longer be disturbed. Wicked people will not oppress them anymore, as they did at the beginning and have done ever since the time I appointed leaders over my people Israel. I will also give you rest from all your enemies..." (2 Samuel 7:10-11)
@detailplus The same god of love that has rained fire and brimstone on cities for following the natures he created them with? The same god of wisdom that killed nearly everyone in a flood then later regretted it? I didn't know perfect omniscient beings were capable of regret but your bible says so, so it must be true.
@hardcorepiet The big bang is more than just an assumption. It's a conclusion that supports all current evidence and makes predictions about future behaviors that have all been verified. The second counter-evidence starts to pile up, it will be rejected.
Also, any afterlife would eventually be hell. Heaven sounds great for awhile but what are you going to do for a billion years? A trillion? Sooner or later even the greatest pleasures will seem supremely boring and you will wish for non-existence
@obeee030 So why does science continually shrink God's domain? People once thought epilepsy, lightning, and rainbows were all from God's direct intervention. Now we know that they're from a brain disorder, electrostatic charges, and refracted light.
Science will fly you to the moon, religion will fly you into buildings.
so..........things got so hot that everything exploded into nothing and then made something. Or........ a GOD of love created such things through wisdom and understaning. Almost simular but one has a future for man and the other doesnt
@jasaguayo i assume atheists watched the god side and were like'i dont agree with that' and dislike whereas a creationist looked at the big bang side and said 'i dont agree with that' and dislike. that system kinda sucks don't it?
taylan637 9 hours ago
Why does this video have dislikes?
All you did was describe the big bang theory and then describe christian beliefs.
I'm guessing some people were offended for some stupid reason?
jasaguayo 2 days ago
I was so into the video but i had to mute this shit cuz the music was annoying the fuck outta me
014daddy 2 months ago
@westauxwaitaks Another case of the bible failing biology: "There are some that only chew the cud or only have a split hoof, but you must not eat them. The camel, though it chews the cud, does not have a split hoof; it is ceremonially unclean for you." (Leviticus 11:4)
A quick glance could verify that camels do in fact have split hooves.
MrClickity 3 months ago
@westauxwaitaks Here's another one: "All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you. There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: ... Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket, or grasshopper." (Leviticus 11:20-22)
Pretty sure even ancient people should've known that grasshoppers have six legs...
MrClickity 3 months ago
@westauxwaitaks I can prove plenty of parts of the bible wrong: "And I will provide a place for my people Israel and will plant them so that they can have a home of their own and no longer be disturbed. Wicked people will not oppress them anymore, as they did at the beginning and have done ever since the time I appointed leaders over my people Israel. I will also give you rest from all your enemies..." (2 Samuel 7:10-11)
No one will oppress the Jews anymore, eh?
MrClickity 3 months ago
@detailplus The same god of love that has rained fire and brimstone on cities for following the natures he created them with? The same god of wisdom that killed nearly everyone in a flood then later regretted it? I didn't know perfect omniscient beings were capable of regret but your bible says so, so it must be true.
MrClickity 3 months ago
@hardcorepiet The big bang is more than just an assumption. It's a conclusion that supports all current evidence and makes predictions about future behaviors that have all been verified. The second counter-evidence starts to pile up, it will be rejected.
Also, any afterlife would eventually be hell. Heaven sounds great for awhile but what are you going to do for a billion years? A trillion? Sooner or later even the greatest pleasures will seem supremely boring and you will wish for non-existence
MrClickity 3 months ago
@obeee030 So why does science continually shrink God's domain? People once thought epilepsy, lightning, and rainbows were all from God's direct intervention. Now we know that they're from a brain disorder, electrostatic charges, and refracted light.
Science will fly you to the moon, religion will fly you into buildings.
MrClickity 3 months ago
so..........things got so hot that everything exploded into nothing and then made something. Or........ a GOD of love created such things through wisdom and understaning. Almost simular but one has a future for man and the other doesnt
detailplus 3 months ago