16:10 vs 16:9 당신의 선택은? 16:10 vs 16:9, your choice?
Top Comments
All Comments (14)
-
16:9 is enough
there is not such a big "gamebreaking" difference
just a few pixxels
I mean look at my notebook o.O such a low resolution x.x
the 16:9 looks cooler :P
-
To the work better the 16:10, but to the gaming better the 16:9! Nice comparation!
-
@vanekatok. As you say. 16:10 monitors are so ridicolous expensive nowadays. So few people buy and like them which means they produce less 16:10 monitors and they can cut less costs in that production. Only fools buy 16:10 today!
-
you get 2x 2560x1440 for the price of a single 2560x1600, so no logic in paying twice money for 11% more resolution, same is for the Cinema display with 21:9 aspect ratio, if you pay twice the money for not seeing those black bars, great for you, as for me , better pay for a premium 60" 16:9 than for a 50" 21:9, or an even better solution would be a projector, but that's the way i see it
-
16:9 and 2560*1440 is the way to go! The best of both worlds!
-
well... there's no need to make a choice...choice is crystal clear.
...
16:9 and 256x1440 ;-)
-
very nice video, although i couldnt understand anything xD but you can nicely see the dfference
-
16:9 or 16:10, make your choice !
Modern high-res monitors need to fit a 1600x1200 image at the minimum. For that reason, 1920x1080 can go die in a fire for all I care, making 1920x1200 the effective minimum for me with a new monitor. Guess which is 16:9 and which is 16:10?
I certainly don't feel gaming is better with a wider screen, just more resolution. Don't know where people are getting that from.
Fortunately, I can find a good 24" 19x12 PVA monitor for $235 shipped. Beats all the 1080p TN crap at that price.
NamelessFragger 9 months ago 4
@mGg0815 who cares about black borders, the problem is with 16:9 u get wider view on video games.
imtryingtowatchvids 5 months ago 3