16:10 vs 16:9 당신의 선택은? 16:10 vs 16:9, your choice?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,774
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 13, 2010

모니터 비율의 논란? 사실 좀 해묵은 논란일지 모르는데요, 얼마 전 다나와 대결 맞짱을 통해 알아본 모니터 비율의 선호도 투표에서 16:10 비율의 모니터가 16:9 비율의 모니터보다 무려 2배 이상 앞선 투표율을 보여줬습니다.
-We have used "Google Translate".-
Monitor percentage of controversy? I do not know the age-old debate that journal, recently mano confrontation with Danawa alahbon monitor the ratio of 16:10 in the preference vote of 16:9 aspect ratio monitor monitors a whopping two times more advanced than the turnout was shown

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Modern high-res monitors need to fit a 1600x1200 image at the minimum. For that reason, 1920x1080 can go die in a fire for all I care, making 1920x1200 the effective minimum for me with a new monitor. Guess which is 16:9 and which is 16:10?

    I certainly don't feel gaming is better with a wider screen, just more resolution. Don't know where people are getting that from.

    Fortunately, I can find a good 24" 19x12 PVA monitor for $235 shipped. Beats all the 1080p TN crap at that price.

  • @mGg0815 who cares about black borders, the problem is with 16:9 u get wider view on video games.

see all

All Comments (14)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 16:9 is enough

    there is not such a big "gamebreaking" difference

    just a few pixxels

    I mean look at my notebook o.O such a low resolution x.x

    the 16:9 looks cooler :P

  • To the work better the 16:10, but to the gaming better the 16:9! Nice comparation!

  • @vanekatok. As you say. 16:10 monitors are so ridicolous expensive nowadays. So few people buy and like them which means they produce less 16:10 monitors and they can cut less costs in that production. Only fools buy 16:10 today!

  • you get 2x 2560x1440 for the price of a single 2560x1600, so no logic in paying twice money for 11% more resolution, same is for the Cinema display with 21:9 aspect ratio, if you pay twice the money for not seeing those black bars, great for you, as for me , better pay for a premium 60" 16:9 than for a 50" 21:9, or an even better solution would be a projector, but that's the way i see it

  • 16:9 and 2560*1440 is the way to go! The best of both worlds!

  • well... there's no need to make a choice...choice is crystal clear.

    ...

    16:9 and 256x1440 ;-)

  • very nice video, although i couldnt understand anything xD but you can nicely see the dfference

  • 16:9 or 16:10, make your choice !

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more