Formula 1 2011 - GP Monaco - Hamilton vs Maldonado
Top Comments
All Comments (253)
-
Hamilton,very cool !
-
@JesstheBear at all... Hamilton was side by ide with Schumacher, with Maldonado instead it was rear right tyre of Maldonado vs front left tyre of Hamliton, that says everything
-
@FormulaOneFan4Eva i agree with ya, but this incident just mimicks india in a few ways... hamilton has every right to be there on the track maldonado turn in on him.
But the hard question is is it hams fault for putting his car there or maldonados for closing the door ? I really would put this as a racing incident tbh because they were both at fault i believe.
But cant argue your point that at the end of the day hamilton gets his nose in to many of these scrapes to blame everyone else
-
das ist 100% hamiltons schuld er hatte zwar die linie aber man kann in so einer kurve nicht so überholen...hamiltons fehler..ganz klar!
-
Hamilton is a idiot and a crash kid
-
I'm a Kobayashi fan so I'm rather neutral on this incident, but looking at the direction of Pastor's car without Hamilton, he would have gone in on an angle too sharp. Even if Hamilton wasn't there, Pastor's right tyre is over the bump, cutting the corner. On top of that, Hamilton was on the inside for a fair amount of time, there was nothing he could do if Pastor shut the lid on him.. can't see why Hamilton recieved the penalty. Shame Hulkenburg has gone. He was a driver with so much potential.
-
i don´t think Maldonado is innocent here. the first points for him were abbordable, he knew that Hamilton was attacking, at the finish line he caught Maldonados slipstream. With a bit more cleverness he could let the room for both and was anaway on a point position. really stupid rookie mistake. PDVSA has a lot of money, but i don´t think their patience is endless...
Completely Maldanados fault, Hamilton did the same move on Schumacher earlier on, no collision, because Schumacher gave an over-taking car room, simple as.
JesstheBear 1 month ago 12
@JesstheBear - India was Massa's fault, definitely. But I don't know how you could find Hamilton innocent for Spa, Monaco or Singapore.
Regardless of whether his fanboys believe the accidents are his fault or not, the fact that he get involved in so many shows it's a little more than bad luck, and the other driver can't be held for ransom EVERY SINGLE TIME...
I personally think Pastor is useless, but in this case, he was innocent, you just need to admit that Hamilton is on occasion, at fault.
FormulaOneFan4Eva 2 weeks ago 7