TT Brown Electrokinetic Apparatus- BAGGED FLYING SAUCERS STILL HAVE PROPULSION-REVERSE!
Uploader Comments (Beamshipcaptain)
Top Comments
-
I think Im officially hooked. I cant stop researching this stuff! Subscribed!
-
OMG, my uncle's books could be worth a fortune of knowledge. By your admission, you are basically re-doing govt work from the 1940 and 50s. I still have a couple of those magazines and the book back home.
All Comments (23)
-
@andflood wait this means you would have to be "inside" the electrogravitic device right? One that used a conducting exterior for the electric potentials. Also meaning you couldn't create an electrogravitic hover board? Well you could but you would feel the inertia right?
-
@andflood Ahhh it all makes sense! This epiphany is so profound...I used to think the cabins of a ufo were unique in that they had to counteract inertia. Are you conducting experiments at home?
-
@trendsetter37 Exactly right. You can either warp spacetime with a lot of massin a small space, or alot of energyin a small space. Energy and mass are EQUIVALENT.That iswhy high energy electrostatics, or electromagnetic toroids produce artificial gravitationfor propulsive effect. BUT,since ever atom of mass within the forcefield moves at the sme rate, inertial mass is canceled out. Gravitational mass stays the same. But without inertia, lightspeed is no longer a barrier!
-
@trendsetter37 In this type of propulsion, every atom and molecule of mass within the superimpsed electricalfield moves at the same rate.There is no "freight cars effect" of motionbeing translated from one part of the model to another part and so on. This is not internalcombustion or even mag-lev. Instant starts and stops and right angle turns at any speed would not be felt. This does not violate any laws of physics. Its because of the nature of forcefield propulsion.
-
@trendsetter37 light cannot escape the event horizon because of the amount of spacetime warping of a black hole. You CAN warp space time to this amount by using voltage as well. Simple.
-
@arshdeep125 actually it is a form of warp drive. Warp drive "warp" space time before and behind the craft travelling. What warps space-time? Massive objects like planets stars and black holes. What else can warp space time? Energy. Why? because E=mc2. Think about it. In the case of tt brown the energy is voltage. Enough Voltage or potential gradient warps space time in the similar manner that planets and black holes can. Furthermore, black holes effectively stop time because of the massive warp
-
@Beamshipcaptain How does it not have inertia? Is it because you are basically falling? i.e. falling towards which ever way space-time is warped (gravity)?
-
@Beamshipcaptain Yes, However IT is NOT warp drive. It's nothing close to a warp drive. You have to travel in a worm hole which is slightly faster than the speed of light, without the time and space limit and aging. There is a patent which involves opening in hyper space, Now, as you travel into hyperspace, you can travel at SUPER LUMINOUS Velocities. Yes there is a warp drive, however I have no proof of its existence, because All i've seen is a Hyperspace travel patent.
This experiment needs to be repeated with better video and test equipment. I would really like to see a bagged lifter on a gram scale and see if there is a reduction in weight. Further more you could attach an unbagged lifter to the scale with a string, record the reduction in weight. Compare that with the bagged lifter results to calculate what percentage ion wind and electrogravitic propulsion each contribute to lift.
ronmann606 2 years ago
Obviously, these experiments we did 10-11 years ago will be repeated, as planned, this spring and summer 2010.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
@Beamshipcaptain Its strange how I printed these patents off of the US patent office, I've just begun the understanding of how this propulsion system works.
Apparently Dr. TT Brown back in the day, he noted with factual evidence that this Electrokinetic Device worked much better in a vacuum, And yes it does work in the Earths Atmosphere, however, it will only work better with Dr Henry W. Wallaces MagnetoHydroDynamic Propulsion system along with the Electrokinetic propulsion system.
arshdeep125 1 year ago
@arshdeep125 Yes of COURSE it works better in vacuum! The controversy stems from the fact that NASA confirmed this,ten years ago, then seems to have been put under a "gag" order since then, despite the fact that new patents were issued! Takaaki Musha confirmed increased efficiency in vacuum, and John Fiala, one of my AEG clients, confirmed Beamship Vacuum operation, this past summer in New Mexico. We can use this technology to explore the STARS, since it has no inertia, this is WARP DRIVE.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
Not sure but I think I can solve your problem of your instrument playing havoc on your video. If you are interested send me a message.
alienpatentoffice 2 years ago
I was'nt the one doing the taping, it was an outfit called Soundphotosynthesis, and they had a sophisticated two-camera setup, using analog video, with long cables all over, and a control-console. Modern Equipment is hardier, more self-contained, wireless, and no black-out problems created by electrostatic-induction.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago