Ken Ham: Genesis genius or just weird beard?
Uploader Comments (kalsolarUK)
Top Comments
-
@dougmoerhoffman You reject it NOT because it is flawed, you reject it because it doesn't tally up with what the bible says and thats your problem. If the bible said the universe was billions of years old you wouldn't have the remotest problem accepting the findings of science. You would be saying "how can virtually ALL of the respected scientists in ALL fields of science ALL be simultaneously wrong when ALL of their findings tally up? ALL OF THEM! How moronic can you be?
All Comments (497)
-
@kalsolarUK So you have no explanation for your theory. Good to know. What do you mean by science?
-
You're funny, but you're wrong, and, all the continents were joined before the flood. If you were to read The Bible.
-
16,000 is nonsense. The Bible claims ravens were on the ark, but they are a modern genus of birds, so an ark full of ancient "kinds" would have none.
Also, where are the millions of transitional forms between those 16,000 and today's millions? If the Genesis farce created the sedimentary rock, none can be fossils, unless they all burrowed through miles of rock before dying.
-
@falseprophetbuster1 "here" even. Arse.
-
@falseprophetbuster1 That's how we fucking talk her in blighty. Swear words aren't swear words. They're fucking punctuation.
-
@kalsolarUK Who's actually in the DARK AGE?
-
@falseprophetbuster1 His swearing adds zest to the narrative. That's why it's funnier with swear.
because of the flood is what made the contenents drift apart DUH!
pokemonlova99 1 year ago
@pokemonlova99 you really believe this genesis nonsense don't you? Despite there being ZERO scientists world wide who support it. (I will ignore the tiny tiny amount of laughed at "christian scientists") who are sadly trying to keep america in the scientific dark ages. Why on earth would you have "faith" in this tiny band of wilfully dishonest scientifc turds.
kalsolarUK 1 year ago
@kalsolarUK well Sir, you do bring up a good point and at some times I do admit I have doubts about my religion and also break God's laws but the main reason why I hold on to the Bible is because I would rather take the chance of believeing in something even at the risk of it not exisisting then to just blow it off and end up dieing and going to Hell for all eternaty but before I hit the post button I do want to say Im not argueing with you I am just answering your question in the last sentince.
pokemonlova99 1 year ago
@pokemonlova99 Very sad that it is fear of a fictional lake of fire rather than love that is holding you to a literal belief. Truth is though, deep down you don't believe it anyway by the sounds of it. You don't have to abandon a belief in god to accept scientific truths about the origins of the universe.
kalsolarUK 1 year ago 6