Pete Sampras Interview 2007 Part 3
Top Comments
All Comments (17)
-
@drwood04 - not sure you can say that! Federer has dominated the worse era in tennis, and gram slam wise hes won 2 more! Roger can basically waltz to a semi final without having to worry about it, there is no chance roger federer would have won all the titles he had in petes era! Agassi, courier, rafter, ivanesevic, kafelnikov, kuerten, moya, becker, henman (on grass), hewitt,... all of these were multiple grand slam winners, all of them were as good as murray/nadal, rog's era is very poor!
-
@MichyGW Thanks fuckface.
-
@DanimalLawlz Ok English major. congrats.
-
That is incorrect grammar. It's "Tennis is not a great love of mine". Not only are you uninformed, you're stupid.
-
This is Class.
-
He's the #2 player of all time...behind Federer. That's cool that you got to meet him. I got to see his 2nd rd match at the 2002 US Open.
-
I feel so blessed to have not only had the opportunity to see Sampras win at Wimbledon in 1999 but to then meet him at the Hall of Fame in 2007...such a class act, humble, modest and gracious and so down to earth! To me he will always be the Greatest of All Time...
If he was in his prime playing with the current players he'd still be number one...his serve volley and attacking game would so frustrate the players of today!
-
What the fuck does it matter to you heartbreakkid1987.
-
The dont watch it!!!!
7:27-7:40......says it all. Pete is the greatest
khesimkong 4 years ago 7
yeah, i mean they just have to have the attention that's why i admire sampras for being a quiet person yet honest and humble.
jmahrky 3 years ago 5