Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Rabbi Shmuley - Idea City 2007 - Part 1

Rabbi Shmuley speaks after Richard Dawkins leaves the stage.  
 
Customize

More From: JVNetwork

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

85 ratings
Sign in to rate
6,859 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (69)   Options

Loading...
raelko (2 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
shmuley is an idiot.
if god is real and uses people like him to represent his case, I will then go back to the god of my ancestors ZEUS and THOT. At least they had thunders, lightening and reason as ways to make themselves known, not a bunch of morons and psychos like this rabbi.
Sad however how Oxford takes this people on and leaves out real great intellectuals.
This rabbi if he is so interested in his god, should go to his god and rid us of his stupidity.
satanasdelincuente (3 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Shmuley makes jokes- makes digressions & never refutes Dawkins points-
GameMiestro (3 months ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
This guy didn't make a single argument in favor of religion, he just made a bunch of cornball jokes against existentialism. I think I'd do pretty dang well in a debate against this guy.
farouqnimer (3 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
The human male is a moderately monogamous animal.
deebaser (4 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
This is a 'debate'?
ChristianMission (4 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
Funny, Dawkins forgot he debated Rabbi Shmuley -because most in attendance said he lost. As is typical of the New Atheists, none of the comments address what Shmuley is saying. Dawkins only attacks religion for being a delusion. Why? Why not attack marriage which many see as oppressive? Why not attack the Royal family whose atocities worldwide for 100s of years are well documented?
raelko (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
because marriage just like anything else is a result of human evolution. We in the light of moral development have developed what you call marriage. 2000 yrs ago there was no such thing, women did not have the same rights, even today is muslim countries they are treated as propoerty.
here is a question you can take to your god.
Do animals marry?

you religious idiots never have a cause, and cannot enter an intelligent argument without playing the comic or the idiot.
goldmonkey77 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
He is a big idiot.
PikeBeth (5 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Wow! You have single-handedly convinced me religion is wrong! Touche!
veriaamiri (7 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
This is a perfect example of how different a scientist and a showman rabbi are in making points and critical thinking.
Every sentence this guy says is full of fallacies and lies... but he represents them in a very flashy and intresting tone I give him credit for that. But after all he is just a mediocre showman, not a scientist or philosopher, and with a very little intellectual honesty. From what he says about dawkins and evolution, it's clear that he doesn't have a clue about them at all

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.