Greg Boyd delivers his lecture "A Flexible Sovereignty: A Biblical Understanding of Providence and the Nature of the Future" at the Open Theology and Science Conference at Azusa Pacific University, April 11, 2008.
This is by far the best, most practical explanation of Open Theism. I don't see how anyone could watch this with an open mind and not get it. It's just common sense!
5:30...parameters is the issue. Open theists' parameters are wider than classical theists, so why not go wider? or why not narrower? the question is: where does the Bible set the parameters? the question is not "where do I think the parameters should be set?" both camps have their answers
This is by far the best, most practical explanation of Open Theism. I don't see how anyone could watch this with an open mind and not get it. It's just common sense!
WesleyPeacockChannel 1 year ago
5:30...parameters is the issue. Open theists' parameters are wider than classical theists, so why not go wider? or why not narrower? the question is: where does the Bible set the parameters? the question is not "where do I think the parameters should be set?" both camps have their answers
nomiddleofwhere 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure he said: "angelic beings" and not "jelly beans", but I wish he did say jellybeans...could that would have been pretty awesome.
rossman0605 1 year ago
Cameronversluis,
The problem of evil is being discussed here because in open theism there actually is no "problem" of evil.
victor77281488 1 year ago
Hahaha, I love the random mention of jellybeans at 6:00. LOL.
cameronversluis 2 years ago
Hahaha, it's funny how by this point open theism is just the background topic and now we're on to the problem of evil...
cameronversluis 2 years ago