Libertarian Enslavement - Dr David R Barker on Freedomain Radio

Dr Barker describes his path to anarchism, the agonies of ending statism, and the short future of fiat currency. Freedomain Radio is the largest and most popular philosophy show on the web - http://www.freedomainradio.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• libertarian
• philosophy
• objectivist
• freedom
• anarchy
• pacifism
• objectivism
• politics
• conservative
• liberal
• democrat
• republican euro crisis

[LEFTYM0M65]

Uh... So indentured servitude is a new economic concept? Really?

[kropotkinbeard1]

@jeffiek He was speaking to me. Not you.

[kropotkinbeard1]

@jeffiek Don't what this refers to. Doesn't apply to anything discussed. Run out of arguments?

[jeffiek]

@kropotkinbeard1 Run out of meds?

[jeffiek]

@Hashishin13 "Well so I guess you are the god of language and the definitions of words then huh? "

Yes.

[kropotkinbeard1]

@Hashishin13 Hence, you don't know what you're talking about regarding anarchism. It really wold be nice if even 1% of the FL's (fake Libertarians) and "anarcho"-capitalists (a non-existent group) actually read something by real anarchists, and then reported what they've read correctly, and without trying to twist what they find into fitting their ideology, as is precisely what happens with the VERY few FL's and NEAC's (non-existent "anarcho"-capitalists) who do actually read anything.

[kropotkinbeard1]

@Hashishin13 Uhh...No. I just know what I'm talking about. Has nothing to do with being the "god" of anything. Well, if it's correct, then it couldn't be otherwise. You can call anarchy butter if you wish. It's simply an incorrect reference, unless, everyone decides to start calling it butter. Also, when you say "we define anarchy as no un-chosen masters." does this mean you only choose your masters? I mean, "no un-chosen" means chosen. With anarchy there are no masters, chosen or otherwise...

[Hashishin13]

@kropotkinbeard1 Well so I guess you are the god of language and the definitions of words then huh? The way you proclaim something to have only your definition how could it be otherwise? Fortunately your not, and we define anarchy as no un-chosen masters.

[kropotkinbeard1]

(See F.1 Are "anarcho"-capitalists really anarchists?)

[kropotkinbeard1]

There is no such thing as "anarcho"-capitalism. It's an oxymoron, as anyone who knows anything about anarchism is well aware. Believing that one is an anarchist simply due to the fact that they reject the state is nonsense. This is a non-issue. And PLEASE don't feel compelled to respond by offering the usual attempts to fuse the two. I know them and they're not worthy of consideration, other than perhaps investigating the actual motives of the proponents.