Is the Bible True?

continued..

the bible in it's context that's what a good educated person does. Read with understanding not jump to conclusions spout off go back read the information again and the say, Oops I guess I should have read the text properly it actually says God was sorry that he had made man and despite the rejection he still loves us and were he made us a people he did not recognise we now have the chance to be at one with him. Go back and this time ask for guidance you won't understand .

You have that wrong you just have to look at society today  and in every conceivable era there are evil that do evil to each other and others, what is good about people in general today. Every race fights itself and others, white people rob others and their kill their own. Black people rob each other and kill their own, Asian , Chinese, Japanese's. The gospel story say's love one another you have buried your head in the wrong part of the bible that accounted for Jews not us. It pays to read

would i get angry at a judge for doing his job. yes. if he does a poor job, and is unjust.

punishing people for things they did not do is not just. god supposedly brought death into the world (and to all people, animals and plants) as punishment for adam and eve's sin. is that just? is it just to condemn everyone and everything to death for the sins of two people?

is it 'just' for the severity of punishment to not fit a crime? 'the wages of all sin is DEATH'. so if i steal a pack of gum, i deserve to die? isn't this the same deity who said 'an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth?'

in 1Chronicles 21:1-14 god kills 70,000 israelites with plague. why? because their king committed the horrible, unforgivable act of taking a census. the people had nothing to do with it, yet were slaughtered by your 'just' god.

he made us with the capacity, and acknowledged bent towards what is defined as 'sin', yet is mad at us for being what he made us to be.

he expects us to believe in him (and will punish us for not), yet provides little if any reliable evidence. and why is it important to believe 'by faith', rather than by evidence? what difference does that make? seems like a rigged game to me. i'm going to hide from you; but you better believe in me or else! wtf@god. make sense you nutter!

these scientists didn't get together like a bunch of kids and 'decide' to 'create' the big bang theory. the experimental evidence increasingly pointed in that direction, and so that's what model was widely adopted, other models then became outdated. progress of scientific knowledge is not evidence of its inefficacy; it proves its effectiveness as a means of knowledge generation.

so because two human beings made a mistake, EVERYONE FOR ALL TIME...THOSE NOT EVEN BORN, AND ALL ANIMALS AND PLANTS WERE PUNISHED.

makes sense. what kind of 'good' judge would enact a sentence like that?
because you stole something, i'll punish your whole species, and all other species everywhere. that's fucking stupid.

Is the Bible True? Obviously not.

LMAO!
Randall Niles describes the bible as storytelling in a tight and cohesive format???? Are you kidding me? Has he even read the bible?

The bible contradicts itself on the day when Jesus was crucified! Mark 14:12, 15:25 and John 19:14. The bible is great fiction my friends. If you take a few solid life lessons from it, then great! But, do not take it literally or you will be foolish and immoral.
Mr. Niles is either incredibly ignorant or a good manipulator.Think critically my friends!
Peace

those signs culminated... in 70CE

how convenient that you totally change the message written because of the way in which you interpret "his message would be preached to all of the earth"

i guess you can just take the word generation right out... might as well since your ignoring it...