Krishnamurti and Kirpal Singh ..
Uploader Comments (TheVedicStudent)
All Comments (77)
-
@TheVedicStudent Krishnamurti did not deny the Vedas, He did not call them false or non-factual. And while the Vedas may be fact, it is still the individuals responsibility to realize truth - perhaps witht he help of the Vedas, or perhaps without the help of the Vedas. There is really nothing to argue about here. Have a beautiful day!
-
To superficially say you are grateful and not do anything about is another form of cheating. Similar like a wolf in sheep's clothing. You try to pass yourself as learned man not accepting any authority. "They are diseased, but they do not want to be treated. If they do not agree to be treated, that is their fault. One who is not Krsna conscious—God conscious—is a madman." You are intelligent, please see we receive knowledge in this video: Parampra System To get him out of Ignorance No Opinion
-
You are wrong the Vedas is the Ultimate authority. You don't accept the Vedas, you are just superficially saying you are grateful. Example: you can accept your mom's authority on who is you father or just be grateful and reject her ultimate authority. So your thinking is like that. You don't accept the authority of the Vedas and no wonder you are confused. I am not on my own I have Krsna and my spiritual master guiding me on this path of Krsna consciousness. You are alone and confused
-
Actually all he did was speak nonsense mental speculation. His is completely against the Vedas because it is speculation in other words mental concoction.
We on the other hand accept the Vedas as actual FACT! We don't decry Vedic authority. The Gita, Purnas, and various other texts are in fact perfect. Why is it perfect because it was spoken by Krsna himself. We can see that in every body their is the presence of the Soul and consciousness and the Vedas describe that relationship.
-
@TheVedicStudent I am so grateful to the Vedas for their wisdom and teachings but in the end, I have no choice but to take their teachings and move on because there is no ultimate authority. What if I have insight regardless of whether I've studied the Vedas or not? Regardless if I follow X or Y? The point is not that I am a follower of anyone because in the end, I am on my own ..... as you are too. Even with the Vedic library in my arsenal, I still need to move on. If I follow, I am stuck.
-
Krishnamurti did not write any books except his own personal journals which were published. He did however, speak, and his words were transcribed and published into books - but he did not write books. Krishnamurti insisted that one should doubt all authority including his own. In fact, he claimed no authority. He asked that one NOT be a follower of either himself or Krsna or anyone else .... Christ, Buddha, Mohammed, the Vedas, etc. Be a light unto oneself ..... There is no other way.
I was under the impression Sri Krsna Chaitanya is Ultimate authority, & even the vedas have a difficult time catching those lotus feet. : )
charukrsnadasa 3 months ago
@charukrsnadasa
Yea. Just see practically where is Krishnamurti philosophy now. It's dead just like him. People who preach God is not a person go to hell for a long time. They take birth in darkest regions of material world. That is explained in the Gita as it is. Hare Krsna.
TheVedicStudent 3 months ago
Krishnamurti coud jack this guy out of his socks before he coud blink.
The Gurus fell at his feet in back rooms. Krishnamurti said no guru,
no master, no religion.
frankzakzak 4 months ago
@frankzakzak
Ohh really? Lol.
TheVedicStudent 4 months ago