John McCain claims he has never attacked Ron Paul
Uploader Comments (RonPaulvsTyranny)
Top Comments
-
Ron Paul's campaign was the last vestige of hope for this once great union of states. I will mourn the loss of America in the coming years. May God help our children because we have failed them.
-
Man - that part when Ron Paul turns and looks directly at McCain shaking his head - behind that very inauspicious smile you can tell Ron Paul would have liked to rip into McCain.
If I had to explain why I respect Mr. Paul, I would cite this video. Ron Paul conveys a combination of honesty and self-control that I have never seen in politics.
Video Responses
All Comments (78)
-
the zionest whores are terrified of revolution
-
Not always but I sure prefer him over Dumbass Mccain.
-
John McCain sold his soul to the neo-cons and liars. So forget him. Ron would never sell his soul and he'll always tell the truth.
Ron Paul '12!!
-
As a social psychology-aspiring senior in college, I definitely agree that the obamasses and mcainiacs have common sense, but there is something better, which is neither good nor bad, which are neo con terms, which is social psych!
-
Anyone who cant keep their story sraight is dangerous to the country.
-
agreed.
-
He's a beam of good sense. The common sense would be that of the millions of Obama or McCain supporters.
-
Ron Paul: a beam of common sense
-
mccain an asshole :D
ron rocks
-
i agree - that moment has been etched in my mind since i first watched this debate.
Obviously most of America agree with the fearmongers and McCain
hiimallen 4 years ago 3
that's not saying much... they are sheep.. they believe anything you tell them so long as it's on fox news.
RonPaulvsTyranny 4 years ago
those who vote for mccain are voting for 4 more years of the Bush-Cheney 'freedom agenda'....are they that blind???
cv1122 4 years ago
they are actually voting for more than that, because in mccain's mind this all goes back to vietnam
RonPaulvsTyranny 4 years ago
I'm certainly not gonna defend McCain, but that's not really an attack. It's just a rebuttal of Ron Paul's position.
I think it's dead wrong, but it IS just a rebuttal.
An attack would be to call him a racist because of those newsletters, for instance.
mrdowns 4 years ago
i disagree, he called him an isolationist and an appreaser, and those are pretty tall charges.
RonPaulvsTyranny 4 years ago