Darwin says Viva la Evolucion!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
214 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 18, 2011

No description available.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Very well said . Thank you :)

  • @witalian1

    The problem is in the "labor theory of value". Marx thinks that the amount of labor put in the production of somthing is what gives it its value. That's just not true. You can waste infinite amnount of effort on useless activities without producing anything valuable. What makes thing valuable is the demand for it. If people need something, and you produce it, it is they who give the thing its value, not your labor. That's why you need market prices.

  • @witalian1

    That's especially bad since in comunism the economy is centraly planned.

  • @GlobalAlternateMedia

    What the USSR did was the only possible way to implement comunism in reality.

    People are different. If they are free, some will choose to cooperate, some will choose to compete. The only way to make everybody cooperate is by force.

    However comunism can not work even if everibody cooperates, because in a monyless society, you can't have market prices, and you can not hope to make rational economic decisions.

  • @witalian1

    No, you're mistaken. If you look up how Marx defined communism it was quite the opposite of what the USSR was. HE defined it as a stateless, moneyless, classless society based on the free association of producers (google the latter), this is known as pure communism (google also).

    I believe that if everyone acted in their self-interest we would reach libertarian communism (i.e. pure communism without Marxist transitional phase).

  • @GlobalAlternateMedia

    "I'm an egoist communist."

    That means you are not communist. You are a libertarian, that has made a personal choice to help others, but you have the freedom to choose not to do that. In communism, you don't have that choice. You do what others had chosen for you, or you go to the gulag.

    There is mutual aid in nature. There is even altruism in nature, but obligatory altruism(collectivism) is not good for humans.

  • @witalian1

    Not necessarily. I'm an egoist communist. One of the central tenets of libertarian communism/socialism is mutual aid (see Kropotkin's biological Mutual Aid: A factor of Evolution).

  • @BinkyHuckleback

    Yes that's true, but that does mot change anything. The genes are selfish. The individuals are altruistic.

  • @witalian1 But isn't that due to the high level of genetic similarity between the queen and her servitors? The suicidal bee commits hari kari to preserve it's own genes - they don't sacrifice themselves defending strange hives (which would be 'true' altruism).

  • @notonewhit

    If you have said empathy, I would probably agree, but altruism - not so much. Being social and being selfless are not the same thing.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more