Stone Cold Wins 2001 Royal Rumble

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
407,974
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 9, 2009

Stone Cold Wins 2001 Royal Rumble Eliminating Kane

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 10 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Uh, the rock and stone cold fought several times at wrestlemania.

  • @Partysen, Did you barely start watching wrestling? Know your facts jabroni.

see all

All Comments (595)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @FavreandMariofan It would have been weird though to put Kane in the title run right before Wrestlemania. The Rock beat Kurt Angle that year at No Way Out for the the title, after the RR. Vince already had it planned for Austin and Rock to face off so Austin could turn heel. Vince knew what he was doing at that time, but I will agree on your opinion that Kane SHOULD have had a period of domination. Austin may not have been as big though had that happen. Think about it...

  • @TheFaisalano uh his real name is dywane johnson(spelling might be wrong) and he IS using the name 'The Rock' in the WWE so ur last point does not make much sense.

  • Now Looking all the way past page 10 for @Partysen 's comment

  • @paulermania did i stutter

  • fuck stone cold won royal rumble 3 times hahahah impossible shit

  • @AmericanGraffiti1962 Austin is a better athlete than Kane? WHATTT?!

  • well i think we can both agree that Austin is a better athlete than Kane thoe. Sure it's scripted and theres a reason y because Austin is the WWF and Kane is just a wrestler that works for the WWF. And Austin got rid of the ringmaster because he even said it sucked so he came up with the greated name and character in WWE history.

  • @AmericanGraffiti1962 Austin is more of a entertainer than athlete. Really.

    BTW, you do know its scripted..right? because you seem too talk of it as if it is not kayfabe.

    The only reason Austin became popular was the McMahon feud. Search The Ringmaster, you will see how pathetic Austin was before.

    It would have been just as good, Austin could easily be there because he demanded it as a Triple Threat, and then we would have all three.

  • @TheFaisalano i agree with what u said about the rock nowadays but seriously nowadays it only takes a dropkick to pin kane and seriously Austin is the most popular superstar of all time and WM17 would not have been just as good, definately not better. U saw Austin signed all over the place. Kane is not unexperienced, in the old days he wasn't nowadays a newcomer faggot that weighs 150 pounds can beat kane. Austin and Rock are 50000 times the athletes kane is and Austin suits the main event

  • @JTC31290 He didint beat Austin.

    Taker beat Austin.

    Its like Mcmahon was like: ''Right, we have a fresh new Talent who is incredibly talented, lets fuck him over with 1 night title reign, and he not even winning the title!''

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more