THE - New Piston Rotary Engine - www.synison.gr (01/12)(S&T)

T H E D O T -
Promising New Piston Rotary Engine -
Invented by SYNISON Laboratory LTD -
Sparta - Hellas (Greece) -
www.synison.gr

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• rotary
• atkinson
• otto
• diesel
• thermodynamics
• transmission
• tesla
• magnet
• efficiency
• ntua
• synison
• zaraphonitis
• zarafonitis
• sparta

[synison]

dear sabriath, thank you for your indications !

from your point of view you are right, but this is just a conceptual video (since 1988) !

there is an internal mechanism which interconnects all the pistons and the drive shaft (and several versions of it are under patent procedure).

please, see comments of other videos of this channel and/or patent documents at SYNISON site.

by the way, your profile is very interesting, especially your description of yourself and your hobbies/interests !

[sidewayzskillz]

nice idea but i dout u could get this to work, and if you did it would need to many parts to control the movement of the pistons and valves etc, it would just break down constantly. its just overly complecated, THINK SIMPLE PEOPLE!!!!

[synison]

thank you dear sidewayzskillz!

there are many answers to your doubts, but here I "copy & paste" one as a response to a comment for the same video, about one year ago:

"...for a classic Otto or Diesel Cycle there is need of SIX moving parts, in total, including the pistons interconnecting transmission mechanism and the output shaft.

for an Atkinson Cycle or any other more or much more advanced Cycle with many additional improving procedures there is need of SEVEN moving parts.

{continued}

[synison]

{...continued}

in general, there is need of FIVE to SEVEN moving parts for any case, from simplest to extremely complicated..."

you can see, also, the other videos and their comments of the same channel or you can study the International Applications WO/2007/125373 (SIX MOVING PARTS for the most cases) and WO/2009/040588 (SEVEN MOVING PARTS for ANY extremely complicated case!).

IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE SIMPLER ?!?!?! :)

.

[synison]

the ratio of working volume to total torus volume of this version is very low, but this is just a conceptual design of 1988!

other, recent, versions have a working volume ratio equal to three to five (WO/2009/040588) and in other versions this ratio increases up to nine to ten.

you just have to watch the other videos of this (synison) channel and study the description and the almost constructive drawings of the International Applications, to see how the pistons are connected and other details.

[synison]

thank you all for your comments! a little biting but also gentle!

MYT is a classic"cat and mouse"engine with two only independently moving groups of pistons, while THE DOT can have ANY desired number of such groups; THE DOT can operate with absolutely PROGRAMMABLE motion of each single group, with ANY desired progressiveness (much smoother operation); with these significant advantages, THE DOT can perform ANY desired cycle, thermodynamic or not, even one with odd number of asymmetrical strokes.

[planetics]

dear sidewayzskillz, can you even imagine another type of engine, different than that THE DOT concept suggests, which operates more smoothly with the minimum possible velocity fluctuation, more quietly, and, at the same time, performs an almost ideal thermodynamic cycle, with three only pistons, with seven only moving parts, with two only different types of non standard machine elements, and, finally, with such mechanical efficiency, such robustness and such compactness ???

[ThusSpakeHistory]

...

he ridicules every innovative effort and reviles our heroes, great personalities of the past, like Hero (Heron), Otto, Diesel and Tesla ...

we have to leave dolente antonios sipakis in his medieval and miserable world and go ahead !

[Fubikon]

And how do you get that power transferred into something you can use?

[nicolawell]

muy interesante tu ingenio. me podrias decir que fondo de musica usaste

porfavor

[MrNoGooD2009]

maximum RPM 1000? LOL XD

[NearAbbeyRoad]

@kassenz

Turn a crankshaft? It all moves one way. It only needs a shaft.

[pwrby2zz]

This engine does not make any sense.

[hugger97z]

i think i understand the combustion,intake,exhaust part but seems like the starting/stopping of the pistons would be hard to balance and the higher the rpm the harder the pistons will rub on the outside of the tube/cylinder,,,,,,,,,,,,,,loo­ks like a wast of time to me.

[nfhslugger]

how would you control where the pistons stop?

[DiabloGk]

to gamato einai pos tha borouse na litourgisei akrivos to idio sxedio me magnites 

[kassenz]

Um, I dont understand how it turns a crankshaft..

[burninmunkeys]

@synison Now, explain to me where the valves go, where the intake is, where the exhaust comes out, where there is room for a spark plug, what runs the valves, etc.