Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

AE911Truth Experts Speak Out

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
89,504
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 9, 2011

PURCHASE this DVD: http://www.ae911truth.net/store/ -- 9/11 TRUTH is the ultimate Anti-War message -- Support the dedicated work of Architect, Richard Gage, AIA, and 1,600 Architects and Engineers. -- Show the DVD to your friends and family so they know the pretext for 2 wars is based on a LIE!

TAGS:
"9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out"

9/11,ae911truth,"veterans for peace",thermite,"9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out"

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • We need to deal with the reality of 9/11, but that will never happen as long as the American people continue to buy into the “two party” false paradigm.

    The definition of insanity is repeating the same behavior over and over again expecting a different result.

    People who vote for establishment candidates fit that definition perfectly.

    Ron Paul is the only sane choice in 2012.

    A&Efor911Truth will not succeed without a drastic change in Washington.

  • Respect to ae 9/11 and there hardwork fuck main stream media who ignore the facts

see all

All Comments (1,317)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @LendMeYourHand And the wreckage came from where?

    I think what you mean was the frame rate was too slow to catch the plane.

    There is more than enough evidence to prove a plane hit the pentagon.

    So either they tied the wreckage to a missile,or, elves ran in and planted it,wrapping it around the columns in the process after the bomb went off,or, a plane hit the pentagon.

    It really is that simple.

  • You people are missing the entire point of the information.

    Not having it means you haven't even researched enough to know if it's even possible.

    How long would it take to put X amount of explosives in X spot,and how would you get X explosives to X spot? How much X explosives for beams? How much X explosives for concrete?

    Those are normal research questions.

  • @stayinstock Not a missle. What you missed by not seeing the Pentagon video, is the explosion going off from inside the Pentagon.

  • @Tzara86 You look at a video and determine explosives were used. You must have some idea what it takes to produce what you are seeing.You make a statement that it had to be explosives.You have to be able to produce a workable detonation diagram.You been at it for how long?

    How can you expect people to believe that statement if all you do is attack anyone that asks a completely relevant question about it?

    How about you just work on the answer and leave it at that.

  • @Tzara86 So the gathering of experts is to do what? Make someone else research it?That's what I'm saying..You have all these experts.I'm sure they must be capable of researching their respected fields of expertise.You waiting for me to prove it?

  • @stayinstock Did you even watch the first, oh... 5 minutes of the film? They make it clear that they don't have all the answers because there hasn't yet been an independent investigation. For them to even begin to answer your questions they need to be able to investigate.

  • @Tzara86 How am I standing in the way of anything?

    If you don't have the answer,just say so.I want to know.Where the explosives were placed and how much?

    I don't understand why it's a problem.

  • @stayinstock And those without a question in their heart will continue to belittle those with the questions in theirs? A theory is a theory, yet to be proven. Don't stand in the way of answers, that makes you no better than those who actually commit the crime.

  • So far you theorist make a claim and challenge anyone to prove you wrong.If no one responds,you claim victory and that's your proof.You wait for someone else to research and then all you do is criticize the results and that proves your theory.

    For once..Do your own research and prove something you say.

    What does it take to blow a building apart?

    I want to know.You're the experts making the claim.You should know.

  • @Tzara86 Exactly the reason I asked the question.

    Where were the explosives placed and how much?What research have you done? So far all I see is a backyard thermite experiment and people talking about how things "look".

    I can talk about how things look and be just as experienced in it as anyone.

    You claim explosives...how are you going to prove it if you can't come up with a plausible sequence diagram for what was seen?

    You have to prove it.It's your claim.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more