THE PENTAGON SECRET TO THE BOEING 757

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
105,852
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 27, 2007

a boeing didnt hit the pentagon
comment for your opion

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 30 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,193)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Aircraft structural aluminum has a higher tensil strength than steel. It can quite easily, moving at over 500 ft. per second, slice through the heavy steel supports of the WTC and Pentagon.

  • I find it funny, that everyone who posts a video, supporting the governments version of events, has the comments disabled lol. they are too afraid someone with common sense will destroy their theories.

  • nevermind the bollocks .. where are 400 seats and all the luggage ?

  • The Pratt/Whitney and the Rolls-Royce engines are TURBO-FAN designs, meaning that a relatively small core jet turbine is turning a 7-foot (2-m) shrouded fan. The turbine blade core in the photograph (minus the blades) fits the dimensions of such an engine. The next time you go to the airport, try sighting down inside a modern turbofan engine, as in any Airbus or late-model Boeing product. You will see it's mostly hollow inside. Big fan/small engine.

  • A level headed person would then assume one of two things...either they are stupid beyond belief or they are lying. Rationale lends me to the answer that the pentagon and those who occupy it aren't stupid by any means and given the fact that are government has a proven history of lying...it begs the questions....why would they lie and what are they lying about?

  • A jet plane engine rotor in the wreckage of the Pentagon? This means that a jet plane of some kind had to have hit the Pentagon! I would agree, but when the engine rotor found could not possibly be the rotor of the plane they said it was, something is wrong.....(continued)

  • @dogsofwarclan it's been done and proven...you're an idiot...(debunking911 . com) has done all of that...learn to read and comprehend. 10 years, you could have an engineering degree by now and realize your utter fucking stupidity. 10 years...zero whistleblowers. 10 years...ZERO scientific backing. 10 years of duuuuuuuuuhhhhhh

  • @Oz1976 now aplie that F=MA to the wtc. 1,2 and seven than good luck calling us a fail. and facepalm yourself whilst your at it

  • twoofers fail at physics, as does this guy, he doesn't understand the basics of f=ma...

  • Level headed thinkers say….

    A jet plane engine rotor in the wreckage of the Pentagon? This means that a jet plane of some kind had to have hit the Pentagon!

    Stupid Liberal Sheep say….

    A jet plane engine rotor in the wreckage of the Pentagon? That engine rotor is not from a 757 that means it was a missile that hit the Pentagon!

    Stupid Fucks….. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more