9/11: The Unidentified Murder Weapons

The four aircraft which crashed on September 11th, 2001 have never been forensically matched to the four passenger planes which were allegedly hijacked that morning. Requests under the Freedom of Information Act have met with denials and refusals, and documents which have been produced, allegedly using data from the only three "Black Box" flight recorders said to have been found, have no serial numbers of the devices listed on them.

The excellent work done by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and other such organizations, in their quest to determine what caused the Twin Towers and WTC 7 to collapse, should never be underestimated. But, being the primary murder weapons, for my money the real smoking guns were, and still are, the four aircraft that were used as weapons on that terrible day, and for them not to have been identified breaks every rule in any book which seeks to teach the art of solving crimes. It is either an oversight beyond belief, on the part of the 9/11 Commission, or part of a criminal conspiracy of immense proportions set in motion to cover up what really happened on September 11th, 2001.

Links to documents researched by Aidan Monaghan

FAA related: http://911blogger.com/node/13149

FBI related: http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/fb...

Serial Numbers: http://911blogger.com/node/14081

The Murray Street Engine was not planted and was not from a Boeing 737, see:
http://ckpi.typepad.com/christopher_k...
The photo of the engine at the land fill on Staten Island was taken by whistleblower Kurt Sonnenfeld, then an official FEMA photographer who is now facing extradition from Argentina on an almost certainly trumped-up murder charge.

Aircraft speed.
"9/11: Impossible Speed & Impact - Busted! Updated"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L978nI...

"9/11 — Possible or Impossible Speed?"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUpKL4...

WTC PLANES THRU STEEL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhKrir...

Tower Shake
12th Comm' On 9/11 TV Fakery - Newtons Law
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcPICd...

Liftoff for Apollo 11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygBxN5...


Notes on Comments: No-planes-in New York comments will be deleted, so will comments with abusive language and swear words.

• Category

  Nonprofits & Activism

[eze4life100]

Love the voice, love the vid... now im soaking up new information of this

[m pars]

this is the best video about 9/11

you have earned the medal of honesty and troth seekers .

thank you

[Anthony Lawson]

"the evidence shows that planes had nothing to do with the destruction of the WTC."

With that I agree.

[Creation2012]

Fair enough. Wherever your time in energy is going however, I strongly recommend you at least read Dr. Wood's book before saying you need more proof. The 'planes' are only connected to the destruction of the WTC in the 'official' explanation. In reality, however, the evidence shows that planes had nothing to do with the destruction of the WTC. They are and were a distraction, regardless of whether planes or easter bunnies hit the towers.

[Anthony Lawson]

You don't seem to understand my point. My video is NOT about how the buildings were destroyed, it is about the initial murder weapons: The Unidentified Planes.

I have neither the energy nor the time to go into directed energy theories. YOU should be posting comments on videos relating to the destruction of the buildings, not on a video about the planes.

[Creation2012]

I read the title, sir and watched the video. If you read Dr. Wood's book, instead of arbitrarily browsing youtube/web, you'd see the staggering amount of data presented; evidence that remains anomalous when attempted to be explained by kinetic or thermal means of destruction. Identifying 'why' something happened prior to properly identifying 'what' happened is an error of syntax. The buildings did not collapse & the multiple-sourced Richter Scale graph data is enough to show just that.

[Anthony Lawson]

That is your opinion and I have read and seen enough about her theories and other opinions about them not to be interested in reading her book. More importantly, you should read the title of this video.

[Creation2012]

Dr. Wood's book doesn't present theory, but evidence. You might find it helpful to actually read her book, if you need more proof.

[Anthony Lawson]

Thank you. The comments display is still a mess, at least where I am, chronological order seems to rule, now, so a comment about another comment does not always appear underneath it.

[ROJEH BAND]

No problem, Cheers!

[Anthony Lawson]

My apologies. YouTube has not been displaying very well, this morning (where I live) and I did send a message to you asking to whom were addressing your comment, because it appeared that it was a general comment on the video. I'm surprised that you didn't see my message to you comments page.

However, if has become clear that you were commenting on what terrymanning1 had written: "Sorry Mr. Lawson etc..." not this video in general.

Sorry, but YouTube produced the confusion, in this instance.

[ROJEH BAND]

I'm a bit baffled by your comment. In your video WTC7 -- This is an Orange it claims that building 7 is a controlled demolition yet you are insulting me for saying the same thing as your video. I'm not sure if you have the wrong person or you are seriously delusional. What is your claim? Does wtc7 look like a demolition to you or not? I would never withdraw my claims of the fact that WTC7 was 100% demolition. I think you're being rude and double faced if this is the case.