WTC Demolition - WTC2 "Knuckle" Zoom

This video MUST be viewed in conjunction with:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXhgFd3bPjQ

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• WTC
• DEMOLITION
• WTC2
• KNUCKLE
• DETONATION

[PatrickWarden]

What was the point of this? To prove that you know how to loop a video 8 or 9 times? Didn't really prove much, except that the building collapsed on itself WITHOUT explosives.

In the words of Penn & Teller (well, just Penn's words actually!): FUCK YOU, ASSHOLES!

[femr2]

I would have though the video title, and the additional annotation highlights would give you a 'clue'. Unless you can be polite, and post constructive comments, ta ta.

[snowdog523]

I do not but I have seen enuogh footage to note detonations as the towers are collapsing. And it doesn't take a physicist to know that a small fire on 2 floors of WTC 7 can in NO WAY make that building collapse in its own footprint. 7 did not have any structural damage from what I have seen, and it collapses? Sorry....it was pulled...

[911insidejob81]

great video!!

STOP 9/11 coverup!!

[bluestargalaxy]

great catch , a clear demolition job.

BTW,,,electrical wire theorys as some suggest is futile cause making any where near those charges to produce melting metal or steel you would need enomous current charges , this is not flimsy flickering from a groundshort,,, its theremite charges in combination with explosives most likely military " silent charges" going off no doubt

[MrJpman2]

a building as big as the wtc probly has miles and miles of electrical wires, could those being ripped apart be the cause. it's just a guess, i know i might sound dumb but im just wondering

[WhyNotTruth]

They didn't expect any of the molten metal to pour outside of the building. There must have been a weakening phase before they set off the full sequence.

[taledarkside]

so how do you explain demolition? thats a building falling on itself. gawd your stupid.

[lancerralliartist]

lol pen n teller are dumb ass trolls like yourself also. you fail to see the proof here.. buildings dont fall on themselves dipshit, that would debunk their pancake theory

[mskydolphin]

Good job femr2.

icbig and Anonkil. When you have a

little time, Click on my name here and

watch some of the videos in "My favorites".

[mskydolphin]

To this day, NO steel framed building has

collapsed due to fire, with the exception of

one hotel whoose top 1/4 was burned to

near nothingness, then that top section collapsed onto the top of the unburned section not causing further collapse.

[snowdog523]

Keep the information coming femr2 - the truth must be told no matter how painfull it is.

[snowdog523]

icbigotenks - also 15 years old on 911 and probably the same dummass sheep

[snowdog523]

Ignorance is bliss for some kids...

anonkil was 15 when the planes hit...yeah, I really think you know what you are talking about...you are a sheep like anyone else who thinks the planes brought down the second tallest skyscrapers in the US.

Keep drinkin the FOX Koolaid...BAAH BAAH

[icbigotenks]

I agree with Anonkll. Femr2 the fact that you actually believe any of this is just absurd.

[icbigotenks]

Like all office buildings, the WTC towers contained a huge volume of air. As they pancaked,-- all that air along with the concrete and other debris pulverized by the force of the collapse-- was ejected with enormous energy. When you have a significant portion of a floor collapsing, it's going to shoot air and concrete dust out the window .Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception.

[icbigotenks]

Once each tower began to collapse, the weight of all the floors above the collapsed zone bore down with pulverizing force on the highest intact floor. Unable to absorb the massive energy, that floor would fail, transmitting the forces to the floor below, allowing the collapse to progress downward through the building in a chain reaction. Engineers call the process "pancaking," and it does not require an explosion to begin, according to David Biggs, a structural engineer at Ryan-Biggs Associates

[anonkll]

discussing this with you is like discussing the seriousness in a spiderman movie, no matter what you say or think its a movie, and didnt actually happen. Much like you're little ideas here about the trade center.

And if you didnt notice, you're "knowledge" of this event is strictly skeptical.

[anonkll]

First off, I'll pretend ejecta is a word. Secondly yes I do. The "ejecta" is called GRAVITY. the building was tipping what do you think everything in there was bolted down? and the explanation for the clearly seen damage was THE FUCKING JUMBO JET THAT FLEW INTO THE BUILDING. holy shit this 12 year old makes me laugh

[anonkll]

what else do i need to say for you to understand....

[anonkll]

All the people that actually consider this to be legit should go drink bleach. You're all absolutely retarded

[peterene]

0:04 north face east corner, familiar colour, the red chips

[j400wel]

u tell people 911 was an inside job and they laugh but when u show them vids they dont know what to say,

[bushdidit2u911]

thats where the thermite[ glowing liquid aluminium] is visible pouring out a few minutes before?? nice zoom work!