Now I know the difference..thank you! Please watch the full video in this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-CYREIusIA
Just a short video to show the difference after the photoshop. Even those behind the scenes video seems manipulated with mixed photoshopped clips and photos blurred, faded etc with her real self clips. Then it ended with her true self. Yes, makeup was fantastic but the photo came out not her??? Nothing wrong with the photoshop but I feel that they failed to keep the real Charice. Glee, her cover albums and other magazines used photoshop but they kept the real Charice. Sorry guys! I'm a Charice fan too. I'm not blind but it is not right that fans are led to illussions. Easy lang sa Photoshop! Enhancing is way far from changing the whole face of our idol. Don't lose the best of her true features and personality.
Don't make her mestisa. Don't make her skin white. Don't make her look like Japanese or Chinese! In other words, maintain her true beauty! What happened to the true Filipinas?
This is just my opinion!!
=================================
Jinkee, Charice magazine covers hounded by 'photoshop' controversy
By MAUREEN MARIE BELMONTE
January 3, 2012, 2:40pm
Netizens dubbed Jinkee's and Charice's covers as the 'photoshop wars' (Photos courtesy of Preview and Mega magazine)
MANILA, Philippines -- Opening the year with a bang and a rousing debate in social networking sites are the January 2012 magazine covers of fierce femmes Jinkee Pacquiao and Charice that to some were maybe a little too fierce for "they barely look like themselves."
Although she's no stranger to being a cover girl for fashion magazines, Jinkee's spread on the latest issue of Mega magazine is her first to have called public attention for good and not-so-good reasons. It was even widely discussed over at Twitter on Jan. 2, landing in the Top 10 trending topics in the Philippines then.
Users aired their opinions on what they call Jinkee's "photoshopped" version.
Sherwin Sowy posted (@ssowy), "There should be an anti-Photoshop law. RT @johnebora: This is Jinkee Pacquiao on the cover of MEGA Magazine.twitpic.com/8242lx"
Kassi C. (@KassIStardust) said, "The cover of Jinkee Pacquiao (Mega Mag) is a joke.she looks so different.Are we getting 'Punk'd?'i mean..just because the show is coming back."
User J.O.M Salazar (@andomsalt), on the other hand, accounted Jinkee's "appearance" to science and to technological innovation.
"Medical science. Or Photoshop. Maybe both. @P0yt: This is JinkeePacquiao on Mega Magazine's cover? SERIOUSLY? What happened to her face?" he posted.
Eloi Hernandez (@eloindigoart) did not mince his words. "Someone give whoever transformed Jinkee Pacquiao into the woman in Mega magazine cover a PhD - galing ng pagka-doktor!" she said.
On the other side of the spectrum, there are those who appreciated Jinkee's beauty.
One of them, Gladys Dizon (@gladizon), said, "Jinkee Pacquiao looks like Kristine Hermosa."
In the end, Mega Publishing Corp's Cheryl Tiu (@cheryltiu) aired her side on the issue.
"Jinkee Pacquiao was NOT photoshopped for MEGA. She's really SIZZLING! The behind the scenes photo! @mega_magazine twitpic.com/824sty"
Singer Charice's first Preview magazine cover was met with criticisms, too.
Drazen Batalla (@drazenbatalla) said, "Wow, pero this is too much editing. :("
"Preview Magazine, Charice, really now huh? #smh #anyare #photoshop" posted Jeszie Lozada (@JeszieLozada).
Sandra Ison (@GhelSandra) even managed to compare the two covers which she labeled as "photoshopwars."
"jinkee pacquaio MEGA MAG vs charice's PREVIEW mag #photoshopwars. charice is still recognizable tho, whereas... iamjammed.com/wp-content/upl" she tweeted.
Veteran makeup artist Juan Sarte (@juansarte) doused the controversy by posting a video that supposedly "proves" that Charice's cover was not "photoshopped."
"@juansarte: Charice for Preview Behind the Scenes video. Eto ang pruweba. Hindi po yun Photoshop.youtube.com/watch?v=RoUmLM" said he.
http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/346861/jinkee-charice-magazine-covers-hounded-p...
@pinaswatcher-I find it rather deceiving when you show portions only that is far from the cover page when the majority of the clips closely resemble the cover page.In fairness why not show the entire clip and let the viewers decide. I saw the entire clip and personally I don't agree with your argument but then again that's my own opinion.
zoom2u100 1 month ago
@zoom2u100 You find it deceiving to watch the real Charice in this video? Isn't that what she's supposed to look? She's wearing the same makeup from beginning to end. No need to show the majority of the clips. You can click the link and watch the entire video. I'm not expert but that video has been mixed with photoshopped clips and pics like on 0:22 Just watch how they blurr, fade, insert the photoshopped and her real self clips. Who's deceiving us?
PINASWATCHER2 1 month ago
@PINASWATCHER2 0:21
PINASWATCHER2 1 month ago
I took everyone's advice to watch her photoshoot to prove that her photo was not over photoshopped. Well, there you go! The real Charice vs. photoshopped Charice. Pls. do not post comments directed to the uploader or your comments will be deleted. Thank you.
PINASWATCHER2 1 month ago