Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Creationist Stupidity, Misconceptions, and Outright Lies Part II

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,841
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 10, 2009

The Big Bang, the origin of matter, the speed of light, entropy and the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and the size of the universe.
Hugh Ross/Kent Hovind debate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWJPHSY63Gw&feature=related

  • likes, 9 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (227)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Nebuli2 Yes, quite true. The theory of natural selection (as well as genetic drift) is the explanation of the fact that evolution occurs.

  • @TheMors666 Evolution is actually a fact. Evolution by natural selection is what's a theory.

  • @Mgiambr Creationism is not a scientific theory it's a hypothesis.  Science is not a scientific theory, method by which we gain knowledge. Space-time is a mathematical model, although it is demonstrated through the theory of special relativity.

    Evolution, germ theory and relativity are examples of scientific theories.

  • @Mgiambr Used colloquially a theory is a hypothesis. It is a guess and requires no evidence to support it. "I have a theory that my lotto numbers will win this week" is an example.

    A scientific theory summarizes a hypothesis (or related hypotheses) and is supported by empirical evidence, repeated testing and scientific laws. If evidence contrary to the theory is presented, it is dis-proven. The theory of relativity is an example.

    Scientific facts are verified and repeatable truths.

  • @TheMors666... Define theory and fact, then see what category those fit into.

  • @Mgiambr Not a scientific theory. A theory in science does not mean the same thing as theory in everyday language.

  • creationism, scienc, space time,... ARE ALL THEORY!

  • if what you say about Kent Hovind at the end, he's a textbook Narcisist.

  • @tjxm21a They have found evidence it might be wrong. There is nothing definitive about those results yet, though. This is not the first time someone has claimed to find a particle that goes faster than c. Do not accept it as true until they publish the results in a peer reviewed journal.

  • amazing video, alot of this is very true. and alot i dunno about but have a very open mind too, it makes more sence then alot of opinions out there atm

    

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more