Are the Gospel accounts contradictory and unreliable?
Loading...
Loading...
5:18
Was Jesus telling the truth when He claimed to be God?by johnankerberg1,404 views- 3:40
Do Matthew and Luke contradict one another?by johnankerberg1,001 views
- 2:19
What did Jesus look like?by johnankerberg5,253 views
- 3:50
What kind of evidence is available about Jesus?by johnankerberg1,284 views
- 5:35
Does the Biblical text give us a false idea of what Jesus was like?by johnankerberg3,917 views
- 3:12
Did Jesus' environment effect His views?by johnankerberg654 views
- 2:06
Does the story of Joseph taking Jesus' body for burial make sense?by johnankerberg996 views
- 1:17
Are the four Gospels contradictory?by johnankerberg2,745 views
- 0:59
Were the Gospel writers eyewitnesses?by johnankerberg2,665 views
- 2:35
Did the Council of Nicea decide which books were in the New Testament?by johnankerberg752 views
- 3:17
The "family tomb of Jesus" and the resurrection.by johnankerberg265 views
- 1:41
Do the Gospels actually record what Jesus said and did?by johnankerberg2,718 views
- 0:55
Dr. Ben Witherington refutes Dr. Michael Shermerby KeithTruth15,334 views
- 2:30
What is the gospel, and why is it the "good news"?by johnankerberg5,293 views
- 4:56
Are the Gospels Reliable for Us Today ?by Expeldarkness792 views
- 2:14
Did the Council of Nicea invent the deity of Jesus?by johnankerberg1,365 views
- 4:44
Are there errors in the Bible texts?by johnankerberg629 views
- 4:08
How were the 27 books of the New Testament chosen?by johnankerberg504 views
- 3:39
How did the canon come down to us?by johnankerberg345 views
- 3:58
12 historical facts about Jesusby johnankerberg707 views
Jesus is a very compelling figure of history, So is Socrates. I very much enjoy both of their teachings. But weather either of them is real or not just doesn’t matter. And I also enjoy the teachings of Lord Krishna, the incarnation of Lord Vishnu. He had some very cool things to say….
raywingfield 1 month ago
If these Gospels are so different and contradicted with each others then how can i be sure what exactly Said By Issah Massih or Jesus Crist?
arifnbd 2 months ago
It shouldn't be, but it is. Typically liberal scholars disagree with what I expressed. Ity's not that big of an issue really...
regelemihai 1 year ago
@regelemihai I didn't say the argument didn't have merit. It definitely does when one looks at the end of Acts. I'm not convinced that the way Acts ends is convincing evidence to necessarily place it in the 60s.
Now, a late 50s date for Mark--a possibility, and I'm not necessarily ruling that out.
Your original post had to do with Witherington's "conservativism." I didn't realize that this was a "conservative/liberal/moderate" issue.
EastofForever 1 year ago
Like who? Evans, Wright, Blomberg to name a few. You may find the argument unconviencing but they have merit. If they're true then we can place Luke at around AD60, and if Mark came before Luke then logically his dating would fall in the 50s.
regelemihai 1 year ago
@regelemihai Many scholars? like who ? and why? yes, i've read unconvincing arguments for the position but I don't find the "necessity" for dating Mark , what? , in the 50s and Luke in the 60s convincing.
EastofForever 1 year ago
@EastofForever
Many scholars. Luke makes no reference to Paul's death in 65 or James's or Peters' (64) all of which were essential figures in the book itself. The fact that they're not mentioned tips us off to believe that it has y et to happen when Luke had finished writing Acts placing the date in the early 60s.
regelemihai 1 year ago
@regelemihai Who said Acts was written pre A.D. 64?
EastofForever 1 year ago
@EastofForever
I dispute that. If Acts was most likely written before AD 64, how could Luke write his Gospel ten years later when we know he wrote the gospel before the book of Acts?
regelemihai 1 year ago
@regelemihai Witherington isn't "conservative." He's objective and less liberally biased.
Secondly, Luke was written in the 70s most likely.
EastofForever 1 year ago