How It All Ends: No Holds Barred (Pt 6 of 6)
Top Comments
All Comments (106)
-
@itchynights I did not dismiss him. I have given him hours of my time by watching his videos.
The evidence for the conspiracy is incredibly huge and detailed if you people would only open your minds and have a look.
If we are to fix these problems in our world, we need to have a full understanding of them.
Get out of the box people!
Why wont YOU listen?
-
Um, you just dismissed him out of hand for not believing conspiracies.
By the way, he would also say if you gave reasonable EVIDENCE, then he would believe a conspiracy theory. Weren't you listening?
-
You're basically advocating for birth control via induced disaster. This is one of the most morally sick arguments around, and a true test of your cynical laziness to come up with a genuine solution to help fellow beings. Like, gee, education (especially for women), sexual education (especially for women), policy, technological development, ethical purchasing, consciousness raising, and I'm sure about 5 other better ones I haven't thought of.
Use your brain AND your heart. Geez.
-
I agree that all your arguments on climate change are correct however when you factor in the population problem the only clear solution is to take no action because the end result of uncontroled global warming is the only thing that can control the larger problem of exponential growth of population.
-
I'd rather be side-lined as a conspiracy theorist, than give away my freedoms as a human being -scared shitless of a proveably flawed and manipulated hypothesis.
Still - I would never deny your right to stand up for your beliefs.
I have taken the time to listen to your aurgument. The more I hear, the less impressed I become.
You have admitted that you dismiss conspiracies out of hand, whilst claiming to be a free thinker.
You have admittedly limited your reality.
There is the flaw.
-
not sure why you are questionning the credibility of the skeptic here, he's already at the bottom of your credibility chart, obviously he has none therefore should not be concerned about having less
-
The Competitive Enterprise Institute, which has been producing pro CO2 commercials with funding from fossil fuel organizations, has previously been supporting big tobacco after having gotten funding from them. Goodness, some people would say that makes them a bunch of Wh**es. They do however have experts on psychological warfare techniques. Many people fall prey to such. Still the best way to counter it is to shine light on it. We can not, nor do we need to convince everyone. Peace.
-
Very true!
Why are the climate change skeptics around here more concerned with arguing their points (even though they're not climate scientists themselves), and not more concerned with running a manpollo project?
If I were a skeptic, I would definitely want a manpollo project - why are most skeptics not in favor of this?
Answer: belligerence and stubbornness and arrogance.
I await a skeptic to say that they support a manpollo project. *I will applaud you if you are as such.*
Thanks =)
-
6:07 - I'm reminded of the phrase "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
The denialists call themselves "skeptics"; this is ananlogous to creationists calling themselves "scientists". If you prove a true skeptic wrong, he will shake your hand and say thanks. If you prove a denialist wrong, he will deny it more.
dawkinsfan41 4 years ago 14
Fuck yeah! That's really what it comes down to. Either prove us wrong, or get out of the way.
cumulusdiscord 3 years ago 8