Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

More and better evidence of NASA photo manipulation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
14,097
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 5, 2012

Hi there,

Many of you wrote me and asked for a sequel of "Evidence of NASA photo manipulation", so here it is. It took quite a while for the completion of this video as I only wanted to show you those images which I am 100% sure of that there is something wrong with them.

This video contains more and better evidence of deliberate manipulation of Apollo images.

Not only samples of manipulated photos can be seen as I have also analyzed a couple photos NASA claims to be "black, or blank". According to NASA these "black" images do not contain anything interesting to see. When NASA says that these "black photos" are of no interest, than alarmbells start ringing in my ears and guess what? It seems that what NASA considers as black is not always (entirely) black ...lol

This is just a very small number and a lot more "exposures" will follow soon.

I hope you enjoy the video.

Greetz,

Sander

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (1967sander)

  • I love all your videos but there seems to be what i believe is an error in one of your conclusions. Toward the end of the video when u talk about the completely black photo you say that the object must be the same size of the crater. But after you say it must be flying above the moon which i agree with. But if it is closer to the camera (since its above the moons surface) and appears to be the same size it must be smaller than the crater. Keep up the great videos

  • @canabal72994

    Yes, you are right about that. Good thinking!

  • You have to understand that these pictures were not digital pictures, but film pictures, which were then skanned into digital. <- the copy was not perfect and they possibly edited it. There will always remain some inperfections that can be found using those filtering techniques. Even if the photos have been edited afterwards to make them look better in high resolution, it doesnt mean that the event is faked. There is plenty of undeniable proof supporting the event. Still and intresting video.

  • @Maekiii

    Hi there, I do not question the event, as I believe that we went to the moon. I do however question the photomaterial NASA shows us. Too many photos have been altered, tampered with. So it is not the moonlanding itself I have my doubts about.

  • The scratches are comets and the floating thing is another galexy

  • Galaxies are too far away to be seen with ordinary camera equipment. The Hasselblad cameras were unable to photograph this kind of objects.

see all

All Comments (61)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • the artifacts on photo 1 are a sign of a clone and drag editing tool

  • So, I've watched most of your latest vids and I conclude from these that there are triangular shaped spaceships, blue ghosts, green smokey plants and spaceworms emitting light, ALL around and on our moon? Oh boy aint that exciting

  • Sander, Can you put the URLs of these images in the describtion box??.. Great video btw!

  • brother the truth is comming soon...its been a festering pimple since roswell...and its about to bust wide open...

  • Thanks for this great video !

  • I should clarify that u actually believe that we went to the moon.

    some ppl cant read between the lines.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more