What The Bleep Are You Talking About? Trailer #7

A movie I'm making that is parody of the movie What The Bleep Do We Know?

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• david
• blaine
• street
• magic
• part
• three
• spoof
• parody
• mikey
• day
• michael
• naughton
• mitch
• silpa
• dave
• morgasen
• cheezeits
• funny

[MunchVids]

I am a science nerd and yes quite frankly WTB has ruined science for the general population.

[starseedfrompl]

watched what the bleep and it makes sense to me, i guess you guys are just dumb

[Zee96969696]

I don't like to go to a psychology class and have all the teachers discredit the idea that consciousness is real. You tell me, do you beleive in consciousness? or do you think that it is an illusion, just like so many scienttific people think that it is an illusion for no good reason. You answer me that question. I don't see any way it could be an illusion. But the reason scintists think it is an illusion is because saying that it is real does not agree with any scientific thery, undersand?

[Zee96969696]

@thelister4910 science is great, and scientists as people who want to find the truth have evolved into 'great truth finders', but i'm just saying science could be better if scientists realised that anything is possible. you might not agree with me, but I think many (most) scientists don't beleive that truly anything is possible. Stop ridiculing people with wacky ideas, stop discrediting wacky ideas. I think that evolution is happening though already

[Zee96969696]

@thelister4910 look, science is a really great system for discovering reality, and what your'e saying is good. what i'm saying though, you might never have come accross it. Most scientists ridicule other scientists who may beleive in UFOs, for example, u might not know about that, but that's true. But today believing in aliens is normal, but not beleiving in UFOs, in the past if you beleived that aliens exist and u are a scientist, u better not tell anyone, otherwise scientists wil discredit u

[thelister4910]

@Zee96969696 This is where you are wrong, scientists don't "want to reject" things having "any possibility of existing". They just want the truth. If something exists, show them the evidence and they will update any relevant theory to integrate the new info into it. That is science. If you have no evidence and can't find any, there is no reason to believe in it.

[Zee96969696]

also we must not forget that there are always more things out there to discover. things that are outside of any laws of nature. things that scientists today want to reject as having any possibility of existing. when Eistein came up with theory of relativity, he thought he discovered the theory of EVERYTHING, but atoms don;t behave the way his theory predicted, and he didn't want that to be the case. We want to know everything, we gotto know that reality is more complicated than what we know

[Zee96969696]

I will tell you why. because I believe that consciousness is real, it maybe made up of many consciousness moments that happen in our brains and maybe somewhere else in universe, or it maybe one thing, but I beleive that consciousness is real, we really are consciouss and it is not an illusion. But science cannot prove that consciousness is real, and therefore many scientists choose to believe that it is an illusion. I ask how is it possible to have an illusion if consciousness is an illusion?

[thelister4910]

@Zee96969696 Yes, what is wrong with rejecting everything besides reality? Instead of believing in orbs just because it's a nice idea for example, why not look for the evidence that orbs are some sort of energy in a different frequency vs that they are normal particles in the air? Why do we need anything but reality? What is the benefit of believing in things that are not real? If orbs ARE entity or energy, let the evidence show this. We don't need to "believe" in orbs if they are not real.

[Zee96969696]

@thelister4910 just like you said. scientists are not interested in believes, scientists are interested in evidence, replecatable evidence... see thats what I'm saying, that's a good way to learn about reality, but as people we should never rely only on that, theres a bigger world out there than what we can prove and show evidence for, that's what I'm saying. alot, not all, but alot of scintists have too much of a grip on scientific view, they reject anything that is not scientific

[Zee96969696]

@thelister4910 do you know the history of how string theory was developed? or how any new idea at first gets just about every scientist to ridicule the person with the new idea. new ideas whould be imbrased, but instead scientists discourage thinking outside of the box... perhaps you just don't see that side of human nature. but its wrong to continue to discourage new crazy wacky ideas, such as aliens, big foot, ghosts, souls, etc. or string theory, parralel universes, extra dimensions

[Zee96969696]

@thelister4910 yes you're right about that. what i'm saying though is that alot of scientists think that what they have already provan is like all there is in the world. a scientist never admits that maybe we have souls, but theres no way to know if we have souls, but so many scientists want to beleive that we don't have souls. do you understand what i'm saying? it's hard to explain. what we learn in psychology is that consciousness must be an illusion, there's big emphasis on that, it's wrong