Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Frustration With Austrian Economics

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
239 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 22, 2010

No description available.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (zthustra)

  • Part 4 : There is no reason you can't be mindful of all economic schools mentioned... they all have some valid points. You may happen to have arguments with ignorant people that have some Austrian views. To call Austrians Racist, or say say that Austrians = Goldbugs.... means you owe an apology to the Austrian theories which you clearly haven't read. Similarly misunderstood... Keynes is not Socialism, and Marx never denied the productive power of the free market, just had a problem with distri.

  • @dmg46664

    My problem is not with the volumous Austrian school of thought which is largely a mystery to laymen and atheist alike, it is with the outspoken, sel-described and assumed Austrians that engage me on a frequent basis in comments and replies to the video. These people are real and they are frustrating and there is no way to get past their dogmatic and religious adherence to the doctine of GOLD, GOLD GOLD.

    To suggest that I have an argument with Mises or Hayek is a misstatement.

  • Part 3: The real value of the Austrian school, and the reason it's back in vogue, is that where as Keynes and the Monetarists (Friedman) prescribe methods of dealing with the Bust, it's the Austrians alone that say the problem was with the Boom! Again see Econstories.tv . Their explanation of the Great Dep, was not like others, interest rate rises (Friedman) in 1929 or fiscal (Keynes). Instead it was the ROARING 20s and crazy inc in prices. So they propose policies to slow this down. Makes sense

  • @dmg46664

    One of the first comments you posted that I mostly agree with. I agree with the part about booms leading to busts, but I don't think I have ever had a self-described or assumed Austrian even go in that direction with discussion. It must be one of the sectarian doctrines reserved for the divine?

    I promise to watch Econostories.tv soon. Thanks for sticking with this thread of comments and please forgive my sarcastic sense of humor.

    We have to talk more about the boom issue.

  • Part 2: It's a myth that Austrians reject mathematical models. See this very insightful post tinyurl-dot-com-slash-2923vcr (READ IT!) . Austrians don't believe you can assign an ordinal number to utility to compare preference. So they rejected the neo-classical utility curve and favour a cardinal approach (believe in an ordered list of preferences only). I think that for the individual they are correct, but for groups the neo-classicals add value.

  • @dmg46664

    That was difficult! It was like asking an atheist to read the liturgical sermon of a Methodist explaining the problems with Presbyterians.

    Still, some expressions were used that I was unfamiliar with and I will recognize them later as subjects more apprpriate to mysticism and theology than to common sense.

    My favorite economist was Will Rogers!

see all

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This guy doesn't seem to have anything to say.

  • What's up with the religious analogies? As far as I'm concerned this is science if unfortunately of the dismal variety (lots of interacting variables). I'm an atheist, yes... but I don't see how that has any bearing on the dialogue. Just ends up being a whole lot of flowery language.

  • I think you have to be very careful with your titles and language. You don't want them to come off like the general news media, as just inflammatory, oversimplified and ambiguous to who you are attacking. Mises, Rothbard & Hayek represent Austrian theology (U talk about praxeology, so arent completely ignorant)..Yet if u had made a distinction in the video, you would have saved me a lot of time. U admit that u didn't realize their contribution to boom theory.. so maybe I have educated a little.

  • @dmg46664

    I will check out Econostories.tv ... looks interesting. It is worth noting that I don't consider myself pro-Keynes or anti-Hayek or anything like that. I'm frustrated by pretty much all the economist-type people.

    I remember learning about Keynes in college and really getting frustrated by how some of the really bright observations he made about human behavior were being used by government to get us to spend saving and borrow money.

    Thanks for the link!

  • @dmg46664

    I can't say that I ever had an online exchange with Hayek or Mises, they don't seem to posting at YouTube these days (grin).

    I can't bring myself to get into a religious debate about economics. I understand that Hayek and Mises are prophets of the church but I think it is more important to engage with living people and what they are saying.

    GOLD! GOLD! GOLD!

    I suppose I should try and read something from Hayek one day, I did read some Mises when I was younger.

  • @dmg46664 I meant ordinal rather than cardinal

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more