Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

NO ✈ THEORY - 119 Reasons Why I'm A No-Planer

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,848
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 9, 2009

Dedicated to Disinfowarrior Jason Bermas

'119 REASONS WHY I'M A NO PLANER'

1) The dearth of plane debris at all of the four crash sites
2) No matching of debris found with actual official planes via serial numbers
3) Not one tail section found or observed from the four crashes though tails survive all crashes
4) No wing tips breaking off in 2nd hit videos
5) No broken off wing tip sections photographed or reported being recovered
6) Not one of hundreds of metal seat frames from the planes photographed or reported being recovered
7) None of four black boxes recovered from ground zero, officially
8) Initial eyewitnesses to the south tower hit described a missile
9) The lack of deceleration as UA175 goes into the south tower
10) The lack of significant deflected debris as UA175 goes into the south tower
11) The lack of anything clearly breaking off the plane as UA175 goes into the south tower
12) Discontinuous dust cloud pattern from UA175 as it goes in the tower in the Hezarkhani video
13) The lack of any alteration in the course of UA175 as it goes in the tower
14) The impossible behavior of UA175 acting indestructible as it goes in the tower then shattering to bits once inside the tower
15) The lack of any explosion as the fuel-filled wings of UA175 make impact with the thick steel columns of WTC2
16) The lack of any significant fire from the port wing of UA175
17) The explosions on tower façade away from impact site as UA175 goes into the south tower
18) The abnormally large explosions produced by wingtips as UA175 goes into the south tower
19) The way the wings of UA175 initially slice into the tower in videos, cleanly with no deflected debris, with an unnatural straight edge along the spot of entry
20) The strange tube-like explosion that appears under the fuselage of UA175 in the Hezarkhani video
21) Parts of the south tower hole become larger after plane has already passed through
22) The south tower hole is completely blocked by debris and broken columns, which contrasts the way the plane slips into tower without slowing or breaking up on video
23) The discrepancy in engine puffs (above wing versus below wing) between Fairbanks and Hezarkhani videos
24) Plane path discrepancies in different 2nd hit videos
25) Odd coloring/tinting in several 2nd hit videos
26) The readily available technology to insert digital objects, such as planes, into video (for instance see Ace Bakers work)
27) The ability of the blue sky on 9/11 to act as natural blue screen
28) Live shot of 2nd hit is same camera feed for CNN, ABC, Fox—they all showed helicopter shot at same key moment
29) In live shot of 2nd hit, camera man taken by surprise by plane—plane suddenly enters frame—cameraman apparently not able to see plane approaching
30) Initial 2nd hit videos, particularly live shot, only show indirect view of tower hit; dont see videos with plane going directly into tower until much later
31) Fox5 side-view shot of plane replayed on CNN, talking heads refer to plane going through the building, but view of plane is cut off by large banner at bottom of screen
32) Both the ABC/CNN/Fox live shot and the Fox5 shots of the 2nd hit have blackouts right after the explosion starts
33) Michael Hezarkhani not allowed to talk about his video by CNN
34) Michael Hezarkhanis amazing ability to pan at the speed of a plane coming over his head from behind
35) The inconsistent story of where Michael Hezarkhani filmed his video
36) The bad acting/over acting of the voices in the black plane video
37) Frames of the black plane video appearing as Robert Clark photos
38) The Manos video where the woman rants about suicide bombers as the 2nd hit occurs and where the videographer also has a video of him and friends sneaking into Area 51
39) The Park Foreman video initially appearing as photo frames on CNN
40) Suspicious history of CameraPlanet, where many amateur videos appeared
41) The CBS video from the north where the plane comes in at a blatantly wrong angle to hit the tower, disappears behind the tower, then the explosion
42) The odd similarity of the Naka Nathtaniel and Park Foreman videos—in particular the same panning motion in both
43) Clear discrepancy in the Anthony Cotsifas photo with the position of the 2nd plane with 2nd hit videos
44) The inconsistent story of Evan Fairbanks and his video
45) Evan Fairbanks alluding to his video being unreal
46) The cartoon-like quality of the plane image in several second hit videos
47) The airframe anomalies in the plane in most 2nd hit videos
48) The fact that high resolution videos of the second hit have not been released
49) The fact that no one has taken up Ace Bakers challenge for $100,000 for an original amateur 2nd hit video
50) David Handschuh (and others, e.g. Victor Cruzate) not seeing the plane despite being in position to see it

more.... http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2009/05/111-reasons-why-i-am-no-planer.html

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (muckletoon)

  • funny the truthers are the ones who Dr. up the videos to prtray what they want...

  • @lojudah845

    the MSN broadcast these videos, go cry to CNN

see all

All Comments (119)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I laughed so hard at the first argument of this vid. There is no explanation for this otherwise that it's an inside job.

  • i dont understand! that only 1 camra caught that first tower impact, im not an american but didnt CNN have the camra pointing to the wtc on the morning of 9/11 for a good amount of time, saying how much of a nice morning it was and then they didnt catch that snap, and a split second later they show it burning again! why no impact vid.. and i really disagree that only 1 person in lower manhatten had caught the disaster, a day like that, camras are everywhere in NY.. i maybe wrong but my opinion

  • Also the buildings should have never collapsed the heat from the explostion was not hot enough to bend the metal and abd the weight from the above floors were not enough weight to make the whole building collapse what is the government had c4 all in the building and at the rite moment boom

  • why the doomsday plane took off

    watch this,

    9/11 the third truth

  • @boi187

    The videos depict fake physics, you're like a child who's just found out Santa Claus doesn't come do your chimney each Xmas.

  • @mcspam2006 I want to shoot you at 560 mph out of a cannon into a building you will go though, and we will say it was a conspiracy. Please move out of the USA! Dont come to NY with that Knock you out!!!!

  • @mcspam2006 your an idiot you should have been in the building and seen the plane yourselves you are morons!!!! and certainly not new yorkers.

  • I am gonna make a video called "1 reason you are not a New Yorker" if you were in the firehouse next to the world trade center when the jet flew just over head it sounded like a floating barrage of Mac Trucks, slamming into a building" You truthers should start using "pee wee hermans big adventure" as proof 9/11 was a conspiracy.you all know the part where Large Marge says " it sounded like a garbage truck dropped from the empire state building" well te govt planted it as a subtle hint about911

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more