The case for the KJV and "Textus Receptus" Part 4
Loading...
Uploader Comments (jinkyfc)
Top Comments
-
An awesome series on the source materials of our scriptures brother.
Recommended for ALL to view.
5*****/ Favorited and shared.
3 years ago 4
All Comments (12)
-
@VeryImagesozo well said!
-
@MrJeremymckinzey I am not anti-James White, nor do I disagree that the KJV is a translation. However, there are three possibilities when it comes to the Bible. (1) Man wrote it (Athiests argument) (2) God wrote it but did not preserve it and therefore it was lost when the originals were destroyed (Critical scholars argument: Reconstructionists) (3) God wrote and preserved it (Bible Believers argument: Preservationists). I am a preservationist. What are you?
-
The KJV is a translation. The KJV is a translation. The KJV is a translation. You need to read The King James Only Controversy by James R. White. So you are telling us that if it is not the KJV then it is NOT the Word of God?! Right? So, what about translations into other languages? You will say it the Word of God for the English speaking people. So, what about the bible being translated into other languages for non speaking tribes and nations?
-
I am a true believer in the KJV and the Textus Receptus
-
I am a true believer in the KJV and the Textus Receptus
-
people don't realize that the seed of Abraham had to be protected for Jesus to come about so many do not understand the battles of the Old Testament they also do not understand the angel view of Genesis 6 and nephilim being in the land in those times. After Jesus' death and resurrection there was no longer a need to battle and perserve any seed because Jesus had already came.
-
Is this your pastor?
-
Hey bro, this guy got pretty fired up, lol, love it.
Came back for a review.
2 years ago 2
- 9:56
The case for the KJV and "Textus Receptus" Part 3by jinkyfc1,224 views
- 9:36
The case for the KJV and "Textus Receptus" Part 2by jinkyfc1,551 views
- 9:25
Gnostic Heresies what the modern translations have removed 1by jinkyfc1,127 views
- 9:08
The Motley Crew Behind The Modern Bible Versions Part 1by jinkyfc1,587 views
- 9:59
Which Bible Can WeTrust? Les Garrett KJV niv rsv esv nlt Part 2 of 5by jinkyfc1,248 views
- 8:59
Which Bible Can We Trust? Les Garrett KJV niv rsv esv nlt Part 3 of 5by jinkyfc1,600 views
- 1:32:51
Antioch vs. Alexandria by Dr. Sam Gippby BereanBeacon8,775 views
- 4:39
BIBLE CODEX VATICANUS MARGIN :"YOU RETARDED IDIOT! DO NOT CORRUPT THE TEXT ! "by IslamzSuperior1,650 views
- 9:13
Battle For The Bible - The English Bible - Wycliffe, Tyndale, Cranmer Part1by jinkyfc9,913 views
- 1:21
Westcott and Hort - Foundation of Bible Corruptionby BereanBeacon4,937 views
- 41:12
The Heresies of Westcott and Hortby BereanBeacon3,602 views
- 9:13
Which Bible Can We Trust? Les Garrett KJV niv rsv esv nlt Part 4 of 5by jinkyfc1,298 views
- 9:48
The Gospel of Luke New Testament KJV Bible Part1by jinkyfc12,632 views
- 7:02
Which Bible Can We Trust? Les Garrett KJV niv rsv esv nlt Part 5 of 5by jinkyfc896 views
- 9:59
Book of Revelation New Testament KJV Bible Part1by jinkyfc9,184 views
- 10:03
Understanding The Battle Over Bible Versions Part 1by jinkyfc1,243 views
- 4:42
Interview with JRR Tolkien in 1968 and Adam Tolkien in 2007by TolkienLibrary118,419 views
- 4:14
What is the difference between a "Textus Receptus Man" and a "King James Man"?by AnotherBroMark440 views
- 9:56
Textus Receptus Parte 2 de 4by ConfederacionCIEF500 views
- 45:12
Les Garrett 2003 Vol 1 - Which Bible Can We Trust?by AlanHemenway139 views
The King James Bible is THE Word of God to the English-speaking people.
I believe that 100%.
Thanks for sharing this.
Kloudes 2 years ago 8
No worries my friend im glad it blessed you
:)
jinkyfc 2 years ago