Einstein's Equation of Life and Death part 5
Top Comments
All Comments (32)
-
@prophexii given that im simply not gona bother ti read through all my prev comments again, as someone pointed out b4, fussion, however is possible. it would prob be much safer to use CO2, break it appart so ud have carbon and breathebal oxygen ( O2 ), from which we could release the o2 into the atmosphere or use it for other chemical reactions and from hense use the retrieved carbon for fussion, instead of burning it again. this process is done on a much more simple stage (H into He) in the sun
-
--maximizer101--
im not sure though...but i think it is bcoz that molecule you have mentioned, CO2...couldn't break down any further into compounds with smaller atomic number...unlike Uranium...
I think they really need a radioactive element to perform nuclear fission....
-
@marty3212000 Find the answer to that and you'll get yourself a Nobel prize!
-
@dsac6007 O_o ur sad :P
-
@farshad94abedi well sry for my uneducated comment last year :D now i can tell you that nuclear fussion is not yet achieved, the experiments in iTER are aiming to stabilize the high tempreture plasma that runs the whole process. But to fuse Carbon or Oxigen you need EXTREEEEMMLLYYYY high tempretures. Nuclear fusion is done with light elements because they fuse at lower tempretures releasing energy. Search for the life cycle of a star and u'll understand the difficulty of fusing Co2 compared to H
-
@abcd321839955 The simple truth is that the Japanese, because of a strong nationalistic ideology, coupled with a very low value of human life, would never have surrendered. Though they were sustaining terrible losses, they were calling upon everyone, even old people and women with sticks, to prepare for an invasion of mainland Japan. Untold hundreds of thousands would have died on both sides. Even after the 2nd bomb the generals did not want to surrender, and the emperor had to call it.
-
where did the ball of energy originate from?
-
@farshad94abedi No no no no
fussion is the "fussion" of two molecules, so we need one stable, and one unstable to create it
-
@infoherper ... I don't understand. How does this differentiate Nazi Germany from the then US Govt?
Even after Nazi surrendered, US used the bomb to end the war quickly... If Germans would have used it, don't you think that they would have given the same excuse? ... Sounds to me like a pathetic excuse of having fun in pulling the trigger!!
-
it is coz co2 is not that easy to trap and it in trapped form it occurs as compound
it wasnt caused cause of the E=Mc2... that was cause for a bunch idiotic sick power politicians from U.s.A
mictlanblume 2 years ago 14
ironic how the formular for destruction is also the formular of creation, lol, by the way, if it is possible for the sun to perform nuclear fussion of a hyrogen atom, an atom that consists of 1 electron and 1 protron, and nutron(s), then y r we using such unstable atoms to perform nuclear fussion?, y dont we use CO2, break it down, and use the attoms in that to perform nuclear fussion, it would be much more cleaner and we would get a lot of energy wile at the same time takin CO2 from the atmosph
farshad94abedi 2 years ago 6