@utahcimbalom I'm just saying that minimalist orchestration really tends to go more hand in hand with the style, which this is obviously not. Really, it just doesnt seem to fit the music, to me.
@Steinway12345 Well, I think we are arguing about the terminology. But I like to call it minimalist orchestration, but it can also be called kaledoscopic (this is less frequently utilized term).
@utahcimbalom eh... but it's mostly monophonic sections with a few 2-voiced polyphonies... It's more of a kaleidoscopic instrumentation than a minimalistic one
it makes sense!
Guisherrr 1 year ago
@Steinway12345 I do not mix two concepts. Orchestration may and may not be a stylistic feature. The style here is very personal, and unique.
utahcimbalom 1 year ago
@utahcimbalom I'm just saying that minimalist orchestration really tends to go more hand in hand with the style, which this is obviously not. Really, it just doesnt seem to fit the music, to me.
Steinway12345 1 year ago
@Steinway12345 Well, I think we are arguing about the terminology. But I like to call it minimalist orchestration, but it can also be called kaledoscopic (this is less frequently utilized term).
utahcimbalom 1 year ago
@utahcimbalom eh... but it's mostly monophonic sections with a few 2-voiced polyphonies... It's more of a kaleidoscopic instrumentation than a minimalistic one
Steinway12345 1 year ago
@Steinway12345 What I meant is minimalization of the role of some instruments, which eventually take prominece
utahcimbalom 1 year ago
@utahcimbalom that makes no sense...
Steinway12345 1 year ago
lumiere claire dans la tete
merci
lucciola30 1 year ago
Wielki Polak!
jebitelny 1 year ago
The gradual change of the orchestration is beautiful. I would determine it as an instrumentation minimalism
utahcimbalom 2 years ago