Fog of War Excerpts - Robert McNamara Craziness of Wars
Top Comments
All Comments (57)
-
@mcleanartists Chomsky is a socialist libertarian properly speaking. But of course has to be characterized as a communist. I rather don't necessarily agree with all of his conclusions myself, but there are certain inevitabilities that have nothing to do with ideology and everything to do with basic math. i.e.; the unsustainable nature of the vast expenditure of the US on things military.
-
@proadmin1 Chomsky is a communist traitor.
-
War is not for this man. He should have stayed at Ford.
-
Compare this to "Bomber "Harris who said about British bombing of Germany that ( to paraphrase ) "to those that say.... I will just say its never been tried before'
Yet to compare Japan firebombing to Dresden - Dresden was not well exclaimed
Dresden's streets were loaded with fuel trucks for the eastern front in Russia
this is an unexplained cause - wheras in Tokyo it was a direct attempt to create fires for destruction
As for Mr. Chomsky - Chomsky is a self promoting leftist political figure
-
@DougglesMagnificent because i think its contradictory when army leaders kill innocent civilians are not convicted of war crimes but regular citizens get put in jail for murder or other crimes against humanity.
-
@vipjan12 how is it ironic? unfair and unfortunate yes, but ironic how.
-
ironic that ppl in army (or leading the army) are not considered criminals when they do kill innocent civilians....
-
What an honest, forthright personal perspective of history.
McNamara did what he had to do, and he did his best.
Nothing dishonorable about that.
-
IM canadian...and I think hes one the gutiest leaders of our time.
-
This gentleman comes across as an honest man,seeking to be truthful not only with us but also himself.A most impressive monologue in my opinion.
Robert Strange McNamara 1916-2009 R.I.P.
hypercommunist 2 years ago 19
Chomsky - kinda HAS to say that, he's not wrong, but both men - at the end of the day were practically if not intellectually boxed into ideological corners to an extent.
Both are extremely intelligent & insightful on the same matters, but I think Chomsky is not constrained by the practicalities & can - due to his position - be alot more honest & alot less practical in his views, whereas McNamara was actually there DOING it. Rather a little bit like a drama critic vs. the actor in the play.
proadmin1 2 years ago 10