Stone Phillips/Jeffrey Dahmer Interview: Segment 1 (Part 4 of 6)

Stone Phillips/Jeffrey Dahmer Interview: "Confessions of a Serial Killer".

Segment 1 (Part 4 of 6)

NOTE: Stay tuned, the rest of the show is on the way!

All copyrights respected.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Jeffrey
• Dahmer
• Stone
• Phillips
• Serial
• Killers
• murder
• True
• Crime
• Milwaukee
• Chicago
• Lionel
• Joyce
• Flint
• Konerak
• Sinthasomphone
• Steven
• Hicks
• Steve
• Tuomi
• Anthony
• Hughes
• Jeremiah
• Weinberger
• Oliver
• Lacy
• victims
• cannibalism
• crime
• forensics
• psychology
• Park
• Dietz

[kurukq]

he was doing so well, then he mentioned creation science

[oSketchMastao]

I agreed with him this whole time until he started talking about jesus.

[Youdumbkids]

Jeffrey Dahmer goes to heaven, the Dalai Lama goes to hell. It makes perfect sense.

[Leksakshund]

@stormingaston Shut up.

[LemonStandTV]

There's no solid uphold in proving that evolution is true? But yet there is solid proof that "God" created everything? come on, seriously

[GShock112]

@stormingaston

You confirm the common saying that catholics are brainwashed idiots.

[tardwhisperer]

@mouthyweasel--Your guilt remains because you claim to know what you're doing.

[spitfiremanlizerd]

@sk8tafrnk you have severe comprehension difficulties.

[wheresmymrright]

What a dick. "Do you think the signs (that you were going to kill and eat people?!?!) were there and he (his father) just missed them?" Yeah Stone, the dads completely to blame. What a Stone cold asswipe.

[sk8tafrnk]

@spitfiremanlizerd Haha... A theory is not an absolute and there's no such thing as a "flawless" theory. You can, however, prove a theory beyond a reasonable doubt. What you said wasn't an understatement, it was a complete void of understanding.

Your argument is extremely ad hoc and because of this you probably don't realize that you have changed positions. Take a fucking Quaalude and don't shit your pants over this. Don't join a debate team either.

[spitfiremanlizerd]

@sk8tafrnk A theory it is not an absolute, IE it still has holes, or potential holes and can change upon new discoveries. stop being so fixated on my understatement. you were originally proposing that all theory's unless flawless should be considered wrong, so I brought up gravity, something with so much evidence for it that it would be ridiculous to consider it wrong.

hotdog=part of food critical thinking=part of intelligence

A segment can not be more important than the whole.

[sk8tafrnk]

@spitfiremanlizerd [second message]

You said that gravity is “just a theory.” If you were using that as an analogy it didn’t even get off the ground because that’s an incorrect statement all together. A theory in science is not the literal meaning of theory. It is not a hypothesis. If you're able to explain something in terms of a scientific theory, you literally can’t prove something more than that.

The hotdog analogy has nothing to do with anything. Read a philosophy book.