Steorn: Sean MacCarthy with SkyNews

to be honest, i know this guy, and he is a real wizkid. It's sorta like having an umbrella with no rain, you know?

It remains a mystery to me, how people can "argue" with their brain being amputated:

- Of course they do not think for one second, otherwise they could find that in history 1000s so called Perpetuum Mobile existed & none of them worked.
- they take a YT video (!!!) as scientific evidence
- they apparently do not like or ignore any scientific methodology, but do not care either if a proof has given empirically and are not interested in why none of the so-called "free energy" "inventions: worked

let the vilifying begin...

Everybody, keep an open mind, because in the end, modern science is only a 400-500 years old

This is NOT a CLOSED system, if the invention was completely isolated from the rest of the universe, it would be a perpetuum mobile, which is impossible, but it is not. There is propably an as yet unobservable transfer of energy.just as 75% of the matter in the universe is not observable. As a sail on a ship uses the unobservable (at least to your eyes) wind to power the vessel, their magnetic configruration might "sail" on an unobservable "wind".

- Conspiracy theories are invented, hihihi to explain why this baloney does not work
- they like seeing themselves as "Out-of-the-box thinkers" because Einstein has also done something that science could not predict (ignoring the fact that Einstein applied intuitively a scientific methodology that has guided him through observation, problem, explanation with existing theory, extension/ modification of the theory, experiment/attempt)

Sean, shock the ignorant monkeys with your invention. They are even ignorant to the fact how fundamentalistic they are in their "beliefs"
With 75% of the matter in the universe that can not be found by science, I deem science knows even less of energy. And yet, my "belief" is that the law of the conservation of energy will not be violated if this invention is true.

Yeah, the tactic that a lot of "free energy" people take, of requiring some sort of scientific validation of their devices prior to manufacturing them or publishing the details of how to build one that really works (without the inventor standing over it 24 hours a day, making "adjustments") is usually a ploy to keep investors pumping money in to their company without having to actually mass-manufacture working devices (because they don't work).

A few inventors might really believe they have something, but with them, their delaying tactics are a weird psychological ploy or mental deficit I haven't quite figured out...other than, when it's proven not to work, they can blame "THEM" for suppressing the technology. And then there are the inventors who actually get killed, probably by idiots who believe the inventor might actually have something, when they don't. Improved energy efficiency is one thing, but free energy, so far, isn't real.

- Completely ignore that so far none of these "free-Energy-crooks" allowed their "inventions" to be neutrally evaluated nor have they performed a public demonstration successfully. A claim alone is sufficient evidence.
- Of course there are evil, evil oil companies to prevent such "inventions" (hihi, they couldn't care less about this shit). Sure, oil companies want to stay in business, but who could stop a car company to launch a "free energy" car to the market, when they would make trillions!