CRX b16a vs mustang GT 5.0L (part2)
Top Comments
All Comments (146)
-
that honda is not that much faster.... pretty sad >.> the 5.0L were wicked slow unless u did an engine swap
-
the stang was stock of course a honda is gunna smoke it if they dump money in it for a shitload of mods just to keep up a v8 if the mustang had the same amount of money to dump into it thiers no way the honda wins
-
@IMPORTMUSCLECAR my stock 88 gt ran 14.9. try again.
-
@MrAlexdive dude. the honda won by 3/4 of a car.if the cars ran exactly the same you can win by 3/4 of a car just by getting off the line .010 sec quicker.and the stang is stock. go race a mustang with a 460 swap in it.
-
@ElmoCRX ta oublier les lbs de torque mon vieux
-
crx for ever (part 2)!!!!!!!!!!!
-
fuck a mustang hondas allways win
-
my friend has a chipped b16a with headers and a pulley,straight 3 inch exhaust and its way faser than this crx,aind its way faster than a stock 5.0,he keeps up with my 5.0 which has pulleys and 373 rear gears,and a intake so tht crx in this video is fairly slow if a 5.0 can keep up by half a car length,or maybe you lost traction because you shoulda smoked him
-
@ThunderMonarch Then Honda can put the head from the B16b on the B16a's block, and we're right back where we started. We can play the what if game all day. Give the four banger credit for being in the same league of an American V8 which dominated the streets in the late 80s/early 90s. The USA could never have built an all motor four cylinder setup to run with a Japanese performance 8 cylinder. Since this CRX is a mock of the JDM CRX SiR (B16a), its pretty much stock VS stock.
headers,exhaust,SRI,chipped vtec 5200 redline: 9200...engine internals stock!... power/weight ratio 170hp/1950pounds==> 225hp/3300pounds
ElmoCRX 2 years ago 4
True. Stock for stock, it is no doubt way easier to turn a V8 into a 12-second car. 5.0 Mustang, 2500. Couple of mods over a weekend, and you have a 12 second car without even altering the engine itself.
MassiveLemon 2 years ago 3