2006 Pro-Tour Honolulu Finals Part 1
Top Comments
All Comments (11)
-
I always wondered why they called him "bad player Flores". His analysis in the beginning was so wrong it was awkward for the other two.
-
And burn.
-
Mike Flores is the shit.
-
I think the fact that there are three commentators makes for some very interesting discussion (especially for someone like me who never actually played in this format).
Besides, it's Mike Friggin' Flores. It's not like Randy Beuhler is infallible.
-
This commentator is annoying (mike Flores), all he does is disagree with randy on almost everything. Its like listening to him bickering for however long this is. I like Brian David marshall much better.
-
A fast RGW deck that relies on lots of small efficient creatures like Kird Ape and Isamaru, Hound of Konda to win.
-
Zoo Deck?
-
The zoo deck is killer i like that deck
Flores is my favorite magic commentator/analyst. He is very opinionated, which means he is often wrong but every once in a while he makes some very smart decision that nobody else figured out and designs a winning deck. He does seem to like disagreeing with whoever he talks to though.
littlteapot 1 year ago 3
I agree that Mike Flores was annoying, especially because he always disagrees with Randy and is ALWAYS wrong, haha, but that's kind of what makes these videos entertaining. Brian David Marshall is kind of boring, he's too much of a yes-man and he rarely points out the intricasies of the plays that the players are making. He speaks in generalizations that are dissonant from what's going on.
utibay 2 years ago 3