This video is unlisted. Only those with the link can see it. Learn more

Digg v4 Publisher Preview

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
59,127
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 28, 2010

No description available.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • But I'm on the internet and I have no friends.

  • Kevin, how are you going to stop people from gaming digg? or abuse from power users?

see all

All Comments (71)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thanks for this Kevin, I have been signed up on Digg for awhile now and really not made proper use of the site - due to never stopping long enough to set up correctly.

  • likeeeeeeeeee.................­...ok

  • @oCatacooDesigns The incorporation as seen by what Google TV by Direct TV or many televisions

  • @asemh who might you consider the power user(s)

  • Will the digg be an app for chrome

  • you're a silly boy. why you ban the sites always last year? rss post on digg? yeah, right !!

  • oh nm. youre not CEO of Digg now anyway, I think bury is the main feature that users want. well at least Facebook is ok, just don't ruin that site. Venture Capital wants their cash returns, I can tell and the fact is noone in their right mind publishing small time is gonna pay for a few sponsored articles unless the price is slightly cheaper and the ability to compete against large news who will still be there regardless. a few buried articles wont hurt them if you seperate the buries from alg

  • ... who might buy a sponsored link once in a while with a little presence ability . The large news corps would still be there even with a few bad stories buried like paris story. Just adding the bury button back alone would probably get users back. Total diggs in place of only diggs even if the number is -4 diggs because of buries. I'm sure the algorithm wouldn't need much tweaking with just adding the bury feature back. just let the bury feature be standalone to let users have a say too...

  • too peer-to-peer... so new users ( or users who are simply not intested in the follow feature ) have no input. As a small publisher and not just a casual reader or person who sends a cool site to look at, I would have no way of attaining any presence against large news corps. StumbleUpon uses peer to peer but still has the bury ( thumbsdown function) still in tact,. Letting casual readers bury a few bad stories of large news corps once in while allows a few smaller good stories to flourish who.

  • Digg is broken, Digg is broken!

    Its now a FaceBookGoogleTwitFuck with a broken axle

    Hey Keven. Hows the traffic the last few days? Shit workin out for you?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more