Nissan GT-R vs Mitsubishi Evo FQ-400 iMOTOR test

www.imotormag.co.uk Here's iMOTOR's "if you had over £50 grand to spend on a Japanese supercar" test.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• mitsubishi
• evo fq-400
• nissan gtr
• car videos
• imotor
• car review
• car
• drive
• test
• review
• road
• UK

[1RUNXBL]

the evo is fast and its pretty good looking and its fast so i choose evo

[kschott185]

Let's talk about price, GTR msrp 84,000 us dollars. For that you get 480 hp, a low 3 second 0 to 60, automatic gearbox, and all wheel drive. Now take a stock Evo GSR at 33,000 usd, buy the AMS 900x package from Chicago based AMS performance for 25,000 usd, and you have 900 hp, a low 3 second 0 to 60, manual gearbox, and all wheel drive for a total of $58,000. Better supercar performance from an Evo, a manual gearbox, and you save 26,000 dollars. Think we have a winner.

[purplegill10]

@StanLTU yeah, u cant rally with aover 2.0L engine

[turbokickass]

fq 400 ..stand for (fucking quick )stock 400 hp..

[ELITEBUTLER]

and the FQ420 would beat the gtr

[ELITEBUTLER]

ill have a evo eny day the gtr just looks like a super car it ay got that jap look like the r33 and the r44

[charliemarc]

mention that huge price difference

[StanLTU]

Evo X is limited to 2 liters ?

[purplegill10]

@SHAKMIZSTER2 at least what the fq400 was

[purplegill10]

@SHAKMIZSTER2 long time ago, now i kno its an 8, i was confused mostly because i never seen that specific evo before

[SHAKMIZSTER2]

@purplegill10 obviously dont kno much about evos

[wparo]

Too many variables for a proper comparison!! Different drivers, different tyres, different idiots...etc